|
sakhalin resources
SAKHALIN'S ENDANGERED WHALES GET SMALL
REPRIEVE
Following intense pressure from an
international coalition of environmental
groups Shell-led Sakhalin Energy is to
postpone the construction of undersea
pipelines in the Sakhalin II oil and gas
project. Until now Sakhalin Energy has
planned to lay the pipelines directly through
the primary feeding habitat of Western Grey
Whales, the world's most critically
endangered population of grey whale.
The consortium consists of Shell, Mitsui,
Mitsubishi and potential international
lenders to the Sakhalin II project, including
the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development.
Campaigners insist that much more remains
to be done before the Sakhalin II project,
the largest ever oil and gas project, can
progress safely. Sakhalin Energy still plans
to build offshore platforms adjacent to the
grey whale habitat. This is just one of the
controversies surrounding the Sakhalin II
project which still need to be addressed by
the project consortium.
oil spill prompts demand for
moratorium on shell's sakhalin ii
project
|
|
Environmental
campaigners staged a mock whale funeral
outside London's European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development to protest
at the threat posed to the Western
Pacific grey whale by plans to expand the
oil and gas extraction in the region.
image: Nick Cobbing/friends of the earth
ewni
|
Conservation organisations are demanding
that Royal Dutch/Shell declare a moratorium
on marine activities on the Sakhalin II
project, following a Category 2 oil spill at
Sakhalin Island on September 8. The spill
occurred when a dredge contracted by Sakhalin
Energy (Royal Dutch/Shell's Sakhalin II
operating company) ran aground at Kholmsk,
spilling an estimated 1,300 barrels of fuel.
It took nine hours for their contractor for
oil spill emergency response to arrive and
conduct visual observations, and more than 48
hours for it to transport necessary equipment
to the site. The groups call on Shell's
Chairman, Lord Oxburgh, to declare a
moratorium on Sakhalin II marine operations
until the oil giant implements an
internationally-accepted Oil Spill Prevention
and Response Plan covering all of the
project's operations. Download the letter to
Lord Oxburgh on the
www.bankwatch.org
website.
clean up the oil spill not just
your image, shell told
Oil giant Shell has outraged environmental
groups by moves to appoint a “crisis
management” public relations officer for its
troubled multi-billion dollar Sakhalin
project in Russia 's Far East , just three
weeks after one of its dredging vessels ran
aground causing a Category 2 oil spill at
Kholmsk on Sakhalin . The “Crisis Management
Specialist” role, within the External Affairs
department, requires communications skills,
but no specific technical understanding of
oil industry emergency procedures.
Dmitry Lisitsyn, of Sakhalin Environment
Watch, commented, "The people of Sakhalin
Island want oil operations to be made safe –
not just someone to tell them they are
safe... Shell must clean up its act, not its
image."
See
www.bankwatch.org/documents/moratorium_letter_Oxbourgh_09_04.pdf
big oil suppressing protest in
sakhalin
|
On January 20th 2005, the Sakhalin
Association of Indigenous Peoples of
the North held a "Green Wave" protest
action against the two oil and gas
projects - Sakhalin 1 and 2 - that are
under development by Exxon, Shell,
British Petroleum, and their
subsidiaries. At -30 degrees Celcius,
people blocked the main roads to the
Sakhalin I and II production point. The
indigenous peoples of Sakhalin, -The
Nivkhi, Evenki, and Uilta - who
practice a traditional self-subsistence
economy based on fishing, hunting,
reindeer herding and wild plant
gathering, are bearing the brunt of the
negative ecological impacts of the
Sakhalin extraction projects.
Read more about the
Nivkhi
|
The absence of complete and reliable
project information and the companies'
unwillingness to engage seriously in dialogue
with indigenous peoples' organizations have
forced the Association to prepare for direct
action. Indigenous peoples, FoE Japan, FoE
EWNI and FoE Netherlands sent letters to
potential lenders, demanding an independent
cultural impact assessment and establishment
of a Development Fund. The protest was
suspended in february while indigenous people
are in discussion with the companies.
For more background information on the
Sakhalin II project’s controversies visit:
www.sakhalin.environment.ru/en/
Although an “agreement” with the oil
company was signed by two indigenous group
representatives, the oil companies have thus
far failed to sign a Memorandum elaborated by
the communities. Meanwhile, Shell-led
Sakhalin Energy and Exxon Oil and Gas are put
pressure upon participants in the run-up to
the Green Wave protest action by visiting
indigenous settlements in an attempt to
persuade them not to participate in the
protest and threatening to fire employees who
participate.
protests over sakhalin soil
dumping
Over a hundred activists on
Sakhalin Island protested in April 2005
against dumping of soil in the Aniva bay at
the construction site of the Sakhalin-2
liquified natural gas plant. Divers of the
Sakhalin Diving club found that dumping had
taken place on the breeding ground of crabs
and scallops. Unsanctioned dumping of soil
during work to build docks for the Sakhalin-2
project may affect the bay's biological
resources. Another two million tons of soil
is scheduled for dumping in the central part
of the bay, a journalist learned. Sakhalin
Energy has launched an internal investigation
into the incident.
Find out
why a senior
member of the British royal family risked
controversy when he visited the Sakhalin II
project.
for more information:
more
about
the financing of the project
about the Sakhalin II project
read the background
about the campaign visit
www.bankwatch.org
more campaign information
www.sakhalin.environment.ru/en/
or
Visit
Friends of the Earth England, Wales and
Northern Ireland
|