17 december 2001
brussels/ la paz/washington
u.s. and biotech corporations impose
genetically modified organisms worldwide
under wto threats
us and argentina use wto threats to
stop gmo bans in bolivia, sri lanka and
croatia.
leaked documents show small
countries face overwhelming pressure when
trying to implement strict regulations on
gmos.
the european union is under
similar pressure
Friends of the Earth International (FoEI)
has denounced the U.S. and other pro-biotech
countries, like Argentina, for bullying small
countries that try to adopt laws prohibiting
genetically modified organisms (GMOs). FoEI
presented leaked documents from the U.S. and
Argentinean governments showing threats to
bring World Trade Organization (WTO) action
against small countries planning to adopt
strict rules on GMOs. Countries like Sri
Lanka and Croatia that planned to adopt bans
on GMOs have been facing overwhelming
pressure. Bolivia, which adopted a resolution
banning GMOs in January 2001, has been forced
to revoke its legislation due to pressure
from Argentina and its agribiotech
corporations. The Bolivian resolution
imposing a ban on import of products,
subproducts and foodstuffs of agriculture
origin derived from GM crops was to be for
one year from January to December 2001. The
Bolivian government pledged in August to
extend the ban after December 2001 and to
upgrade it to a Supreme Decree having the
full force of law. This promise was made on
23rd August 2001 in a written agreement that
the Bolivian government signed with
farmworker and small farmer groups. FOBOMADE,
a Bolivian environmental organization has
recently, learned that the government passed
a resolution in October revoking the ban
without warning the public, or making an
official announcement.
"The revocation of the Resolution shows the
weakness of our Government in the face of
Argentinean pressure and the agribiotech
companies said Maria Luisa Ramos from
FOBOMADE. "It is outrageous that a small
country like ours is forced to accept
genetically modified foods, despite public
opposition".
FoEI obtained a leaked memo sent from the
Bolivian Mission in Geneva to their Minister
of Foreign Affairs. It asserts that "the
(Argentinean) soya corporate sector is behind
it, because they export five thousand
millions of dollars of genetically modified
soy to Europe and North America". In the same
memo, the Bolivian Ambassador in Geneva,
seems to cave under the Argentina pressure,
relaying to her Minister that the Bolivian
resolution appears to be overruled by the
WTO, saying "the present situation is very
sensitive, because the Bolivian Mission
considers, that from the point of view of WTO
rules, the reasons given by the Argentinean
Mission are very valid and our country does
not have any solid justification to back the
measure adopted." The Argentineans have been
strongly threatening Bolivia for months with
WTO sanctions as other documents revealed
today by FoEI show. Pressure on countries
deciding to adopt strict laws on GMOs is
becoming a pattern. Early in the year, the
Sri Lanka government drafted a Food Act which
would ban GMOs in their country. The
Agricultural Counselor from the U.S. Embassy
in India threatened Sri Lanka with a
challenge of the ban under the WTO which
would have cost the country $190 million in
penalties if Sri Lanka did not lift the ban.
The Food Act was supposed to enter into force
in September 2001, but due to the pressure by
the U.S. and Australia the ban was deferred
indefinitely.
In Croatia, at a roundtable organized by
the Croatian Environmental Minister on
December 10th, FoEI and the European NGO
ANPED denounced the U.S. bullying of the
Croatian government to drop its plans to
adopt a moratorium on GMOs. In a leaked memo
obtained by Green Action - FoE Croatia, the
U.S. Embassy says that "if such a ban is
implemented the U.S. government must consider
its rights under the WTO". The Croatian
Environmental Protection and Zoning Minister
Bozo Kovacevic said on December 12th he would
not respond to the letter of the U.S.
Embassy. The memo also asserts that biotech
food products "have been demonstrated to be
as safe as conventional food products in the
U.S. and elsewhere". However U.S. groups
assert in a letter addressed to the Croatian
Minister of Environment in response to this
memo, that the U.S. regulatory framework and
monitoring policies are inadequate to
currently conclude that GMOs are safe.
"The U.S. government s promotion of
genetically modified organisms is so
aggressive that it is working to overturn
other countries laws , said Larry Bohlen
from Friends of the Earth U.S. We are
calling on our government to stop
unilaterally imposing its will on other
parts of the world".
The European Union is under similar
pressure The U.S. memo to Croatia also
discourages other countries from adopting
legal frameworks on GMOs similar to the
European Union (EU). The U.S. Embassy
"suggests caution in implementing EU biotech
directives, which require substantial
infrastructure and institutional capacity to
carry out." At present, the U.S. is trying to
undermine proposed EU legislation on labeling
and traceability and is pressuring the EU to
lift its moratorium. The EU has notified the
WTO of its new labeling and traceability
provisions on GMOs. WTO members can comment
on them until the 28th of December, and the
European Commission has said they it will
make public the comments and questions
related to this process. The U.S.
fundamentally opposes the proposed
regulations. Alan Larson, U.S. Under
Secretary of State for Economic and
Agricultural Affairs said last week in
Brussels that "he was not prepared to accept
the premise that there will be no progress on
approvals for another two years". Speculation
about a future launching by the U.S. of a
trade dispute against the EU through the WTO
is growing.
"The World Trade Organization is the
instrument that the U.S. and biotech
corporations are using to force countries
around the world to accept GMOs" said Juan
Lopez, Adviser on Genetic Engineering at
FoEI. "We call on all governments of the
world to stand up to the WTO. Every country
in the world should have the right to
establish moratoria on the introduction of
GMOs until adequate regulatory frameworks
and effective monitoring and enforcement
capabilities are in place to ensure sound
biosafety regulation ."
For more information:
To view the Bolivian resolution on GMOs, and
documents from the Argentinian Embassy and
Mission and the Bolivian Mission, visit:
www.foeeurope.org/press/
To view the Croatian Draft Law, and U.S.
memo, U.S. NGO reply to the memo and other
background information visit:
ww.zelena-akcija.hr
Contact information:
Brussels. Friends of the Earth
International, Juan Lopez,+32 2 542 01 87,
cell phone: +32 477 391 496
and Friends of the Earth Europe, Gill
Lacroix, tel. ++32 2 542 01 82
La Paz. FOBOMADE. Maria Luisa Ramos, +591 2
231 0547,+591 2 2422105
Washington. Friends of the Earth U.S., Larry
Bohlen, +1 202 783 7400
|