thursday, 1 march 2001
g8 environment ministers meet in
trieste
friends of the earth highlight the failed
g8 policy on nuclear power plants in eastern
europe
new report published: limited
safety/unlimited risk
When G8 environment ministers meet Friday
March 2nd in Trieste, Friends of the Earth
activists will launch a new report ‘Limited
Safety/Unlimited Risk’. In a demonstration
outside the summit building, FOE campaigners
will call on the G8 to face the issue of
nuclear risk. The report criticizes the G8’s
failure to shut down high-risk reactors and
demands that the G8 stop squandering
tax-payers’ millions in subsidies to its
ailing and discredited nuclear power
industry.
At the 1992 G7 meeting in Munich,
governments promised that decrepit
Soviet-designed nuclear plants in Central
& Eastern Europe would be shut down to
prevent another disaster like Chernobyl, but
so far none of these high risk reactors [1]
have been closed.
Dodgy fix-it contracts in Central and
Eastern Europe for the West’s desperate
nuclear industry (i.e. Siemens/Framatom) have
resulted in the operational lives of
dangerous reactors being extended. Experts in
European governments [2] and NGOs are highly
critical of the dubious safety assessments
and methodologies carried out to justify
so-called ‘safety improvements’ in old plants
already officially declared
‘non-upgradable’.
Patricia Lorenz from Friends of the Earth
Europe explains:
“Kozloduy in Bulgaria was declared
non-upgradeable. Bohunice in Slovakia was
declared non-upgradeable. Vague talk of
‘safety improvements’ is nothing more than a
PR strategy. An evaluation must be made,
clear goals must be set and the final closure
of high risk reactors assured.”
Every penny spent on extending the
operational life of high risk ‘dinosaur’
reactors diverts investment from other
opportunities - CEE countries have a massive
potential for energy efficiency projects.
Laura Radiconcini, Friends of the Earth
Italy:
“Lower safety standards in the East
constitute a threat on two fronts: the very
real threat of dangerous reactors in
operation, with Krsko 140 km from Triest and
Temelin 30 km from the Austrian border, and
the risk that lower standards in the East
become a justification for low levels of
safety in the West. No country can say that
nuclear safety is a national issue –
radioactivity knows no borders.”
The G8 currently discuss plans for the
disposal of plutonium from nuclear weapons:
financing the production and use of MOX, a
plutonium-based fuel. These plans would
result in recklessly expensive and
technically unsound projects, constituting
the birth of a new plutonium industry.
Friends of the Earth calls for a complete
revision of nuclear policy at G8 and EU
levels [3].
Patricia Lorenz, FOEE:
“Friends of the Earth calls on the G8 to
stop hijacking the disarmament issue to
justify MOX fuel production. The G8 plutonium
plans would require yet more tax-payer money
being poured into the bottomless pit that is
the nuclear industry and more dodgy
modifications to nuclear plants in the former
Soviet Union and so further delay the closure
of high risk reactors.”
Friends of the Earth is organising two
events in Trieste:
On the eve of the G8 summit:
March 1st 4 pm
Sala Eurostar, Central Railway Station of
Trieste
Press conference & presentation of a new
report "Limited Safety/Unlimited Risk"
March 2nd, 17:30 & March 3rd,
09:30
Palazzo della Regione, in front of the G8
meeting
FOE activists from Austria, Croatia, the
Czech Republic and Slovenia demonstrate
against nuclear risk and the continued
inaction of EU governments to honestly and
comprehensively address the safety problems
of nuclear power.
Further information and the report Limited
Safety / Unlimited Risk available from:
Patricia Lorenz, Friends of the Earth Europe
Energy Campaigner:
Tel: +32 2 542 0184
Email: Patricia.Lorenz@foeeurope.org
Footnotes:
[1] In its Agenda 2000, the EU¥s blueprint
on enlargement, the need for high nuclear
safety was confirmed and closure timetables
were established. Eg. Kozloduy in Bulgaria
was to be closed by 1998.
[2] An Austrian study found that, with
regards to the K2/R4 reactors in the Ukraine:
“safety issues (are) not dealt with
adequately” and that the problems were so
severe that they “call into question the
concept of the modernisation program”. The
report went on to state that claims that
“K2R4 (is) reaching an ‘internationally
acceptable safety level’ or ‘a safety level
similar to that of similarly aged but
recently re-licensed Western plants’ as
forwarded by Energoatom, are in no way
substantiated.” (Report to the Austrian
Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry,
Environment and Water Management by the Risk
Research Institute of the Academic Senate of
the University of Vienna.)
[3] Friends of the Earth sets out the
following guidelines in Limited
Safety/Unlimited Risk: - No double standards.
Projects in the East must not be of lower
standard than those financed in the West. -
No case-by-case approach to safety
assessments. There must be a clear
methodology and clear safety targets. -
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
standards are insufficient. - Nuclear safety
standards must be up-to-date. Safety
standards from the 1960s and 1970s are not
acceptable. - Information must be made public
without exceptions
|