lima, peru, april 23, 2003
world bank and newmont corporation ignore
human health impacts of mercury spill
-Only few weeks ahead of a key ruling by the
Peruvian constitutional court on the planned
expansion of the Yanacocha gold mine, local
Peruvian communities denounced the Minera
Yanacocha final assessment of a June 2000
mercury spill.
Minera Yanacocha (a joint venture of
Newmont, the world's largest gold mining
corporation, the World Bank Group and the
Peruvian corporation Minas Buenaventura)
presented the assessment on April 3, 2003 in
Lima, Peru.
People from three villages affected by the
June 2000 spill claim that Yanacocha fails to
adress the direct impacts the mercury spill
had on their health. This is just the latest
episode in an ongoing tale of controversies
surrounding the World Bank Group- supported
Yanacocha gold mine.
Minera Yanacocha intends to expand mining
operations to a mountain that is the main
water source for the region's capital,
Cajamarca. Peruvians living near the mine
have officially declared the mountain
'off-limits' for mining. Minera Yanacocha is
currently appealing this declaration at the
Peruvian constitutional court, explicitly
acting against the wishes of the local
population.
In June 2000, 151 kg mercury fell off a
truck coming from the Yanacocha mine in
Northern Peru, one of the largest gold mines
in the world. People from surrounding
villages did not know what the substance was
and picked it up to take it home. To date,
the corporation failed to provide affected
people with alleviating treatment.
The corporation's final assessment of the
June 2000 mercury spill (available at
www.yanacocha.com.pe/ing ) concludes that
there are no unacceptable risks associated
with the mercury spill. However, the
methodology and scope of the assessment are
highly questionable. The environmental
studies do not assess direct human health
impacts nor the contamination levels inside
people's houses. They merely describe the
quality of water and the health of plants and
insects.
The impacted communities were not
officially notified of an April 3
presentation of the report in Lima. However,
a large group of villagers traveled to the
capital and stated that to date, the health
problems they face have been neither analysed
nor attended to.
'It is unacceptable that the corporation
neglects the direct impacts on people. Since
the spill, people in three villages have been
suffering from serious problems with their
skin, vision and nervous systems. They still
expect to receive adequate medical treatment,
which should have been a first priority,'
said Carlos Abanto of Labor/Friends of the
Earth Peru.
'The World Bank Group as a shareholder
should ensure that Yanacocha undertakes an
analysis of people's health and responds
effectively to the existing problems',
according to Janneke Bruil of Friends of the
Earth International. 'The ongoing social
conflicts surrounding the Yanacocha
operations call into question whether public
financing for this mine is appropriate',
Bruil added.
Minera Yanacocha is a joint venture of the
US based Newmont Mining Corporation (51%),
the Peruvian state-owned Compañia de Minas
Buenaventura (44%) and the International
Finance Corporation (IFC, 5%), the private
sector finance arm of the World Bank Group.
The Yanacocha mine has been the subject of
two official complaints with the Ombudsman of
the IFC. Since the start of its World Bank
supported operations in 1993, the mine has
given rise to deep social and environmental
concerns. Drawing upon experiences in Peru
and elsewhere, Friends of the Earth
International is calling upon the World Bank
to end its support for destructive mining and
oil projects.
For more information, contact:
Carlos Abanto, Coordinator of the Lima
office of Asociación Civil Labor/ Friends of
the Earth Peru: + 511 261 65 15
www.labor.org.pe
Janneke Bruil, Coordinator International
Financial Institutions Programme: +31 20 622
1369
|