<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/member-group-collections/canada/RSS">
  <title>Canada</title>
  <link>http://www.foei.org</link>

  <description>
    
      
    
  </description>

  

  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2008-11-26T16:24:58Z</syn:updateBase>
        

  <image rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/summary-for-download"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/el-salvador-building-movements-against-mining-and-mega-projects"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/resisting-oil-mining-and-gas"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/financial-report-2009"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/international-activities/indigenous-people-protest-new-york"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/program-highlights"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/communications-in-2007/our-website/cyberaction-successes-in-2007http-www-foei-org-en-get-involved-take-action-maandagshoek"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/europe/france-201c5-minutes-of-rest-for-the-planet201d-a-huge-success"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/europe/ewni-shamed-shell-abandons-wildlife-photo-sponsorship"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/north-america/canada-holding-government-accountable-for-lack-of-climate-action"/>
      
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/summary-for-download">
    <title>annual report 2009 - executive summary</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/summary-for-download</link>
    <description>Download a summarized version of the 2009 annual report.</description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-04T14:46:55Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>File</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/el-salvador-building-movements-against-mining-and-mega-projects">
    <title>El Salvador: building movements against mining and mega-projects</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/el-salvador-building-movements-against-mining-and-mega-projects</link>
    <description>El Salvador signed the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) with other Central American countries and the US in 2004. This allowed transnational corporations such as Holcim, Monsanto and Pacific Rim to intensify their operations in the country. With the support of local ruling elites, they have been able to secure the necessary infrastructure to extract the countries’ natural resources to export to markets with stronger currencies. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/1e6bff8a3b4a62c2cb306b277adf7983/image_preview" alt="el salvador caminata por La Vida-1" /></p>
<p>El Salvador's previous conservative government consistently promoted the expansion of extractive industries and international trade, as well as mega-infrastructure projects. The subsequent left-wing government elected in 2009 also set off down the same path, neglecting the demands of communities affected by industries and related foreign direct investments.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Until recently there was little public debate in El Salvador about the role and interests of transnational corporations, and the negative impacts that their projects can have on biodiversity and people. Little information was available to the public, and few organizations were capable of fostering and facilitating relevant discussions.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what happened</h3>
<p>To reverse this trend, Friends of the Earth El Salvador / CESTA has been working with others to improve awareness and strengthen collective leadership in grassroots organizations representing the people most affected by neoliberalism. These include the Global Movement of Victims and Peoples Affected by Climate Change (MOVIAC), which was initiated in El Salvador in 2007; the El Salvador National Network of People Threatened and Affected by Dams and Canals; and the El Salvador Movement of People Affected by Lead.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In 2009, Friends of the Earth El Salvador, along with 16 groups from communities affected by megaprojects, prepared a legal proposal called <em>El Grito de las Víctimas</em> (The Scream of the Victims) that summarizes community demands concerning mega-projects, investments and international trade. The initiative contains proposals for reforms to El Salvador’s Environmental Law, Public Health Code, and Municipal Code. It was presented to the Ministry of Environment and Strategic Affairs in a public forum with the Minister of the Environment and around 100 community leaders and NGOs (see video <a class="external-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6c3DK6_xw8">here</a>)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also in 2009, communities in northern El Salvador, worried about the environmental impacts of proposed mining projects, continued to campaign vigorously alongside environmental, religious and human rights organizations, to halt what would have been El Salvador's first large-scale mine in 70 years. The inhabitants of Cabañas have been trying to stop the proposed El Dorado gold mine, which would have used water-intensive cyanide processing. They are concerned that the mine will contaminate the nearby river, use excessive amounts of water, and endanger farming.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what changed</h3>
<p>These collaborative grassroots campaigns have notched up a number of successes in the last two to three years. With respect to mining they were even successful in convincing then President Antonio Saca (of the Conservative ARENA party) to rethink the issuing of gold mining. In March 2008, Saca announced that he would not grant mining permits until an in-depth study of the environmental impacts of gold mining had been undertaken. President Mauricio Funes, elected in 2009, is also opposed to gold mining and supports a similar study being undertaken.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>However, the Canadian mining company Pacific Rim Corp responded to these grassroots efforts by filing an investor suit against the Salvadoran government, under the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) (but through a recently formed US Nevada-based subsidiary, Pac Rim Cayman LLC, since Canada is not a party to CAFTA).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Disturbingly, however, these successes have also been accompanied by increasing repression in El Salvador, including the systematic assassination of mining activists associated with protests against Pacific Rim (including the much missed Marcelo Rivera, Ramiro Rivera Gómez, Felicita Echeverría, and Dora Santos Sorto Rodríguez).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what next?</h3>
<p>Friends of the Earth El Salvador will continue to collaborate with other members of civil society to galvanize community opposition to mining and megaprojects that have serious social and environmental consequences.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Pacific Rim’s CAFTA case against El Salvador will be heard at the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in 2010, and Friends of the Earth El Salvador will focus much of its efforts on ensuring that companies such as Pacific Rim are not able to start gold mining in El Salvador.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>with thanks to our funders: the dutch ministry of foreign affairs (dgis)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-04T11:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/resisting-oil-mining-and-gas">
    <title>Resisting oil, mining and gas program highlights</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/resisting-oil-mining-and-gas</link>
    <description>The Resisting Mining, Oil and Gas Program is based on a vision in which the world does not depend on minerals, oil and gas. Its objective is to dismantle corporate control over minerals, oil and gas, and to stop the destruction and violations of communities and ecosystems.
</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/8b1c52368daa275623c3a129ea7ee4d0/image_preview" alt="IMG_6508 USED RMOG.JPG" />The Resisting Mining, Oil and Gas (RMOG) Program is a new FoEI program, and groups are concentrating on mapping FoEI’s current work with communities, as well as planning joint campaign work on mining, oil and gas corporations. Work on a campaigning manual on resisting mining, oil and gas is already underway; and the RMOG Program has also agreed to establish a campaign against Holcin, a cement, aggregates and concrete transnational corporation. An international campaign against Goldcorp is also planned.<br /><br />Some collaborative international activities are also underway. On 22 July, Friends of the Earth groups participated in a number of actions against Canadian open-pit mines, in countries including Australia, Canada, Mexico and Thailand, to mark the Global Day of Action Against Open Pit Mining on 22 July. <br /><br />Another important event was the Conference on "Extractive Industries: Blessing or Curse? Impacts of the Oil and Gas Industry," held by FoE Europe in Brussels on 13 October. The conference focused on the environmental, climate and social impacts of oil and gas industry operations; the sustainable use of natural resources; accountability for damages; financial subsidies; an assessment of the oil and gas industry’s performance in relation to poverty eradication and environmental impacts; and case studies on Canadian tar sands, Arctic oil exploration, and the impacts of European oil and gas operations in Nigeria and Russia. The conference was a great success, and was given coverage on the BBC's Record Europe show. A photo exhibit showing the negative impact of extractive industries was also shown in France and Italy.<br /><br />FoEI co-sponsored an event on Climate Change, Debt and Dissent, organized by Oilwatch South America and the Southern Peoples Creditors Alliance, 9-12 October 2009, in Quito, Ecuador. FoE Nigeria currently hosts the secretariat of Oilwatch Africa, and participated in the event, together with FoE Costa Rica. <br /><br />Testimonies from mining communities also featured in FoEI’s new media projects. For example, a series of women from Sulawesi, Indonesia share their stories and struggles resisting mining activities by Canadian nickel mining corporation Vale Inco. The Chief of Mbikikiki village talks about water pollution caused by the construction of the Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline owned by Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Petronas. Ada Zuñiga Hernandez from Honduras talks about the health impacts of mining activities by Canadian corporation, Goldcorp Inc, and a woman from Peru describes the feared destruction of an area because of plans by another Canadian company, Manhattan Minerals, to develop a gold mine in Tambogrande. A video produced by FoE Indonesia and FoE Netherlands that shows how tin mining in Indonesia is wrecking forests and coral reefs, and another short FoE Netherlands movie about oil pollution in Nigeria, "Back to Nature Travels Nigeria," can both be seen on YouTube. <br /><br />FoEI also embarked on an ambitious project to create a series of video testimonies of women affected by large-scale metal mining. These 'Women Re-Sisters' are strong, impressive women who talk about the impacts of mining on their lives: their food, health, water, economic situation, land, families and personal security. They also share strategies for resistance and mobilization. Testimonies from women affected by mining in Bulgaria and Guatemala can currently be viewed on the FoEI YouTube channel. With deep respect and recognition for the work of the participating groups, and the sisters who were brave enough to feature in these films.<br /><br />In 2009, FoEI groups around the world continued their national and regional campaigns against mining, oil and gas. Africa is focusing on conducting research into mining, shedding light on its negative effects. Asia also continues its struggle to support communities that resist mining. There have been some significant achievements.<br /><br />In the Netherlands, for example, the first court hearing in the case against Shell, brought by&nbsp;four Nigerian victims of Shell oil leaks&nbsp;and FoE Netherlands is now underway. On 3 December 2009, this unique legal action started at the court in The Hague. Shell asked the court to rule that the Dutch court has no jurisdiction over Shell Nigeria. But on 30 December the court held that the Dutch court does have jurisdiction over the operations of Shell Nigeria. Given that Shell has now lost this point, an important hurdle has been overcome, and the 'real' lawsuit can begin. This is the first time in history that a Dutch company has been brought to trial in a Dutch court for damages occurring abroad. FoEI also collaborated with several organizations to publish "Shell's Big Dirty Secret," which documents Shell's continued investment in the dirtiest forms of energy and its position as the world's most carbon intensive oil company. <br /><br />In the US, the ShellGuilty campaign launched by FoEI, Oil Change and Platform London, finally saw justice done in 2009. After legal battles lasting nearly fourteen years, oil giant Royal Dutch Shell has also been forced to pay a US$15.5 million out-of-court settlement. Plaintiffs from the Ogoni region of the Niger Delta have successfully held Shell accountable for complicity in human rights atrocities committed against the Ogoni people in the 1990s, including the execution of writer and activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. <br /><br />Some FoEI groups aim to change national mining laws through advocacy and legal routes. In December 2009, for example, FoE Hungary celebrated the introduction of a landmark ban on the use of cyanide in mining ten years after the tragic Baia Mare spill. It was passed with a virtually unprecedented majority. FoE Philippines has filed an Alternative Mining Bill, now known as House Bill 6342. The bill is intended to scrap and replace the Mining Act of 1995 and introduce a new mining policy to regulate the exploration, development and utilization of mineral resources and to ensure the equitable sharing of benefits, including for the State, indigenous peoples and local communities. <br /><br />Many FoE groups, including those seeking to change legislation, are working with local communities affected by mining to challenge the presence of specific mining and extraction companies more directly. For example:</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In January 2009, FoE Indonesia sent a complaint to Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, following the Australian government’s failure to fulfil a promise to respond directly to Indonesian organizations challenging the activities of Australian mining companies. FoE Indonesia has compiled a dossier detailing the involvement of numerous Australian mining companies in environmental destruction and human rights violations.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In February 2009, communities in Guatemala asked the legislature and the Ministry of Energy and Mines to issue a moratorium on mining licenses of all types, until reforms to the Mining Act are agreed with them. Social organizations in the affected municipalities claim that current amendments to the document do not provide for community interests.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Also in February, and after years of being marginalized in relation to decisions about their ancestral lands, the Subanon people on Mindanao island came another step closer to asserting control over their territory. Their lands are currently being exploited by TVI Resource Development Phils (TVIRDI), a subsidiary of Canadian mining company TVI Pacific. Around 20 Subanon Indigenous People and farmers living within the TVIRDI mining area in Mount Canatuan, the Subanon tribe’s sacred site, halted blasting and drilling activities at the Canadian company’s open-pit mining operation, after a successful occupation of the site.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In March 2009, the Ghana National Coalition on Mining, a group of communities affected by mining in Ghana and civil society organizations including FoE Ghana, opposed the Ghanaian Environmental Protection Agency, which had granted environmental permits to Newmont Ghana Gold Limited and Adamus Resources to conduct surface gold mining activities.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In September 2009, FoE Hungary published their first annual alternative report on the Hungarian Oil Company (MOL). The report held a mirror up to the company’s annual report and assessed the company’s activities in 2008. After examining company data, the authors gave examples showing that the company’s practices do not actually match up to its rhetoric.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Also in September, FoE Costa Rica, together with and as part of Costa Rica’s popular movement, participated in a visit to mining company Crucitas, organized by the Supreme Court of Costa Rica, which had suspended Crucitas’s mining permit. There is a risk that the Supreme Court will favor the mining company, in which case FoE Costa Rica plans more mobilizations across the country, to stop this mining company restarting its activities.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Again in September, FoE Guatemala organized an international mission to verify violations of human, environmental and economic rights by mining transnational corporations operating in Guatemala, such as GoldCorp. The aim of the mission was to ensure that the voices of victims, who are criminalized in Guatemala, can be heard at the international level. Participants included FoE Uruguay, FoE El Salvador, and FoE Costa Rica, together with people from Amnesty International and others.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<p><br />Building strong networks and alliances against the mining and extractive industries is also a priority for the RMOG Program. For example, a new network in Colombia, the Colombian Network Against Mining, has been established to challenge transnational corporations operating in Colombia with the support of the Colombian government. One of the first acts of this network was to support the demands of workers and the population struggling against British Petroleum in Tauramena, Colombia.<br /><br />Many other critical activities were also undertaken by the Federation in 2009. For example:</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In Nigeria, the Second National Consultation on the Environment, 25 - 26 November 2009, saw civil society leaders, community-based organizations, civil society organizations, development experts, academia, legal practitioners, the media and representatives of government agencies come together to consider a post-petroleum Nigeria. The event was organized by FoE Nigeria in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Environment.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">FoE Philippines and Alyansa Tigil Mina co-hosted a discussion on "Tracing the Gold, Tracing the Money," in Cagayan de Oro City on 29 June. The event was designed to give participants the knowledge and skills they need to find out how mining companies finance their activities and where they sell their products. This kind of research often reveals excellent intervention points for advocates wanting to stop mining operations in their localities.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">A new report from FoE Netherlands, "Mining Matters," which was published in June 2009, reviewed practices used in mining tin (in Indonesia, Bolivia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Burma), bauxite (Guinea and Jamaica), and copper (Chile, Peru, Zambia and Indonesia (Grasberg)). It also examined the policies of seven companies using imported metals in the Netherlands.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Security forces arrested the director of FoE Indonesia and the Head of FoE Indonesia's Regional Department&nbsp;during a peaceful protest organized by FoE Indonesia and other NGOs together with fisherfolk organizations. The groups organized an event parallel to the World Ocean Conference (WOC) and Coal Triangle Summit 2009 which was held in Manado, Indonesia, 11-14 May. The peoples’ gathering was to draw the attention of WOC to small fisherfolks’ concerns – especially their call to ban the dumping of tailing minings into the sea - and to demand that these concerns be put on the WOC’s agenda.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In 2009 Young FoE Norway’s priority campaign was against oil drilling off the beautiful Lofoten Islands, home to the world’s largest stock of cod and biggest cold water coral reef. They started several local groups in a network called "O`olkaction against oil drilling outside the Lofoten Islands." They also took a group of representatives from political youth parties out to the Lofoten Islands for one week, to highlight the fact that there are other possibilities besides drilling for oil in Northern Norway.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">FoE France has published a synthesis report "Public subsidies to fossil fuels in France and the European Union," which reveals that the wealthy oil industry benefited from French subsidies of over €400 million between 2004 and 2008, mainly in the form of export guarantees. FoE’s research also shows that €6 billion of European money has been given to the fossil fuel industry over the past five years.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<p><br />The main areas of work of the program are:</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Community Resistance</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Campaign Against Corporations</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Policies and Mechanisms that Promote Mining, Oil and Gas</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Decreasing Consumption to Stop Demand for Mining, Oil and Gas</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>coordinators and participants</h3>
<p>Co-coordinator: Natalia Atz Sunuc, FoE Guatemala<br />Co-coordinator: Romel Cardenas de Vera, FoE Philippines<br /><br />The RMOG steering group includes:<br /><br /></p>
<ul><li>For Africa, Chima Williams, FoE Nigeria</li><li>For APac, Natalie Lowrey, Australia</li><li>For ATALC, Andres Idarraga, Colombia</li><li>For Europe, Geert Ritsema, Netherlands</li><li>For North America, Adina Matisoff, FoE USA</li></ul>
<p><br />This is a new FoEI program and the co-coordinators and steering group are still in the processing of developing and implementing a fully-fledged strategy and workplan. Groups that have expressed an interest in participating include: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Curacao, El Salvador, FoE Europe, EWNI, France, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Japan, Liberia, Malawi, Malaysia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Togo and the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-07-23T11:25:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/financial-report-2009">
    <title>financial report 2009</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/financial-report-2009</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-19T07:50:43Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>File</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/international-activities/indigenous-people-protest-new-york">
    <title>april: indigenous people on tour in north america</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/international-activities/indigenous-people-protest-new-york</link>
    <description>An international delegation of Indigenous Peoples gathered in front of the offices of the NY State Controller's office in May to deliver a formal complaint to the office's investigation Division. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<img class="image-left" src="resolveuid/01cbf84e5f46ece7aed272686abc6857/image_preview" alt="indigenous people on tour in north america" />
<p>The delegation, which included representatives from Australia, Papua New Guinea, and the United States, claimed that Barrick Gold, in which the New York State Pension Fund holds almost $100 million in shares, is responsible for human rights abuses and the environmental devastation of their land. Friends of the Earth International campaigners were also present at the meeting, specifically calling attention to the impact that climate change is having on Indigenous Peoples.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="resolveuid/22d9d2a0129f359e77052c8a5564e6b0" class="internal-link" title="australia">FoE Australia</a> campaigner Natalie Lowrey and Neville "Chappy" Williams, Wiradjuri elder and spokesperson for Mooka and Kalara United Families, were previously in Canada as part of a speaking tour of communities affected by Barrick Gold mining operations. The tour took place following the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues in New York in April. The impact of climate change on indigenous communities from around the poor world, and the solutions taken by the industrialized countries to tackle the current environmental crisis, were among the main concerns at this meeting. The indigenous peoples and organizations that took part in the forum discussed climate change, cultural diversity, the livelihood of the native peoples and new challenges.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<a href="resolveuid/0bbf882402ed925265a23ca8a14d4d43" class="internal-link" title="uruguay: real world radio voices concerns of thousands">Real World Radio</a> interviewed Juana Camacho, a member of Friends of the Earth's international coordination of the climate and energy program. She said: "Friends of the Earth International is here to support the struggle of the indigenous movement for climate justice, to learn from their position and strategies to face the environmental crisis. We are&nbsp; not following closely what is happening in the UN structure, but rather what happens&nbsp; outside".
<p>&nbsp;</p>
You can listen to her interview here: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.radiomundoreal.fm/rmr/rmr/?q=en/node/25196">www.radiomundoreal.fm/rmr/rmr/?q=en/node/25196</a>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>climate</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>affected peoples</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2009-04-01T11:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/program-highlights">
    <title>programs and campaigns highlights in 2009</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/program-highlights</link>
    <description> In 2009, Friends of the Earth International had six active international programs and campaigns. Within these we coordinated a wide range of actions at the international, regional, national and local levels, that improve the ability of peoples and communities around the world to secure sustainable livelihoods and protect our environment for generations to come.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/5e90f1116660e8fabdf0438e5f2f3310/image_preview" alt="nnimmo-copenhagen" />
<h3>climate justice and energy</h3>
<p>Our <a href="resolveuid/2b1148b04b917f1dd54159f1b4f38149" class="internal-link" title="Climate justice and energy sovereignty program highlights in 2009">Climate Justice and Energy (CJE) Program</a>’s overall objective is to build a diverse, effective and global movement for climate justice. In 2009, FoEI continued our close collaboration with key social movements, especially La Via Campesina, and the World March of Women, and the new Movement of Victims Affected by Climate Change in Central America (MOVIAC). New links with indigenous networks and movements were also fostered at key events during the year, and FoEI collaborated with many other networks including Climate Justice Now!, Asia Pacific Peoples’ Solidarity for Climate Justice, and Climate Justice Action.<br /><br />The CJE Program’s goal is to ensure that rich industrialized Annex I countries had committed to needed emissions reductions, and to financing and transferring technology to help developing countries mitigate and adapt to climate change. We published a substantial number of policy proposals and analyses in the run-up to the COP-15 UNFCCC in Copenhagen, in December 2009. This included an ethical climate finance criteria matrix, which provided governments with a set of criteria for judging climate financing mechanisms proposed during negotiations. <br /><br />FoEI took a team of 400 activists to Copenhagen, who variously engaged in lobbying and advocacy work, and organizing and participating in alternative events and daily mobilizations, including our hugely successful Flood for Climate Justice mobilization. The joint efforts of FoEI and key allies helped to ensure that a number of governments, including Bolivia, officially voiced their concerns about the potential negative impacts of UNFCCC, World Bank and national policies to finance Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD).<br /><br />Although the results of the Copenhagen summit were extremely disappointing, many FoEI member groups in the global North have been very effective in persuading their governments to introduce binding national climate change laws, which will help to reduce those countries’ carbon emissions. This was especially the case in Europe where France, Scotland and the UK passed climate change laws setting binding emissions reductions targets. It seems likely that similar laws will soon be passed in a number of other European countries including Austria, Belgium, Hungary, Ireland and Slovenia.<br /><br />During 2009 we also continued to monitor and conduct advocacy around the World Bank’s framework on ‘clean energy investment’ and the emissions trading schemes promoted by the international financial institutions (IFIs). In 2009, both the G-20 and the UN made agreements to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels, which will have a positive impact on the development and spread of renewable energy technologies.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>food sovereignty</h3>
<p>FoEI’s <a href="resolveuid/f08719e320f862403079c0d2557ef35f" class="internal-link" title="Food Sovereignty Program highlights in 2009">Food Sovereignty Program</a>&nbsp;aims to halt the corporate control of food, and stop the spread of genetically modified organisms: it defends the right of people to determine and control their own food systems. In 2009, we attended the High-Level Meeting on Food Security in Madrid where Via Campesina and FoE Spain’s joint actions outside the conference got excellent coverage, and Henry Saragih from Via Campesina was eventually invited to speak on behalf of civil society in the final plenary session. The response from the conference was striking: the applause was deafening, and the meeting ended without consensus on a new 'Global Partnership', which was in line with civil society proposals (although the official website is less clear about this outcome).<br /><br />The 17th session of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) also saw important progress on food sovereignty when proposals from the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food included peoples’ right to access land and define their own food policies, and the need for governments to support the least protected people and implement food production models that do not contribute to climate change. This position strongly echoes the positions of Vía Campesina and FoEI, although it does not yet go far enough.<br /><br />The struggle for a GM-free world remains a priority, and includes campaigns against soy monocultures, genetically modified (GM) food aid, and the dominant model of production. FoEI is campaigning to increase land available to family farmers and for rural agriculture. In 2009, we published our annual research report on GM crops, "Who Benefits from GM Crops? Feeding the biotech giants, not the world’s poor," which challenges the ability of GM crops to contribute to poverty reduction, global food security or sustainable farming.<br /><br />Friends of the Earth groups and allies are also maintaining pressure on the GM industry at the national and regional levels. This has had a particularly marked impact in Europe, where European Commission efforts to allow two new varieties of genetically modified (GM) maize to be grown in Europe, and to force Greece, Hungary and France to drop their national bans on a similar GM maize, were overturned by member states. Civil society organizations were clearly instrumental in this. This resistance received a further boost in April, when Germany banned Monsanto's GM maize MON810. This was a huge success for FoE Germany and other environmental and agricultural organizations who have worked hard for this outcome for many years. There have also been strong FoE campaigns against GM crops in many countries, including Mexico, Nigeria and Paraguay.<br /><br />FoEI is also starting to build a new global campaign challenging agribusiness, with Via Campesina and the World March of Women. In 2009, this included regional food sovereignty forums in Paraguay and Nigeria. Together with Food and Water Watch and the European Co-ordination of Via Campesina, we also produced a groundbreaking film, "Killing Fields: the battle to feed factory farms," which investigates the impacts of growing soy in South America to feed factory farms in Europe.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>agrofuels</h3>
<p>FoEI’s <a href="resolveuid/7c6b87f79570c3e31bc678ce6164f6a2" class="internal-link" title="Agrofuels campaign highlights in 2009">Agrofuels Campaign</a> aims to stop the production, trade and consumption of agrofuels, by raising public awareness about its negative impacts on local communities and globally. In 2009, the campaign focused on strengthening local communities’ defence of their territories, and exposing ‘false solutions’ to the climate and energy crisis. A prerequisite for this was compiling FoEI members’ research, reports, and national and regional positions. <br /><br />The Agrofuels Campaign integrates FoEI’s ongoing campaign against deforestation caused by oil palm plantations. 2009 was particularly notable because of the World Bank’s suspension of its investments in oil palm plantation companies. A coalition of local and international NGOs, spearheaded by the UK organization Forest Peoples Program and including FoE Netherlands, had previously filed a complaint with the International Finance Corporation (IFC)'s internal watchdog, the Compliance Advisory Ombudsman office (CAO), about a series of loans to palm oil giant&nbsp;Wilmar International. A joint report by three NGOs (FoE Netherlands, Kontak Rakyat Borneo and Gemawan) had examined&nbsp;Wilmar's plantations in Sambas, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, and found that the company was working with dubious licenses, and was entangled in land rights conflicts and illegal logging activities. This complaint triggered an audit by the CAO, which concluded that the IFC had violated its own procedures, and that commercial interests had overruled the IFC's environmental and social standards.<br /><br />FoEI groups from Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea also joined forces to develop and propose a mandatory code of conduct for Malaysian palm oil companies operating in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. They received positive responses from Malaysia’s Human Rights Council and the Opposition Party, who accepted that Malaysian palm oil expansion has created adverse impacts. Friends of the Earth also filed a complaint with the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) against the Malaysian Palm Oil Council for falsely advertising that palm oil is the "only product able to sustainably and efficiently meet a larger portion of the world's increasing demand for oil crop-based consumer goods, foodstuffs and biofuels." The ASA ruled that this statement was misleading, as was the Malaysian Palm Oil Council’s claim that palm oil contributes to alleviation of poverty. In November 2009, we also filed a grievance with the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) against the Malaysian Palm Oil Council, for violating the members' Code of Conduct and continuing to mislead the public and make unsubstantiated claims about the production, procurement and use of palm oil.<br /><br />A process of capacity-building on agrofuels, land rights and monoculture was also initiated in Central America. We helped to coordinate different groups and communities wanting to work together on agrofuels. A video on Monocultures, Land and Agrofuels in Central America was created by FoE El Salvador with communities’ support. FoEI also organized an international delegation to gather evidence on the impact of agrofuels in Colombia.<br /><br />Friends of the Earth’s aim of reaching a broader public was also substantially achieved through the broadcasting of footage from our commissioned film, "Lost in Palm Oil."<br /><br />Lobbying efforts in Europe remain focused on challenging the EU’s target of 10% of all road transport fuel coming from ‘renewable’ sources by 2020, with a majority likely to come from agrofuels. Key to this is increasing Europeans’ awareness of the impacts of agrofuels and about potential alternatives. This included the publication of "Biofuels: handle with care," an analysis of EU biofuels policy with recommendations for action, in November 2009.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>forests and biodiversity<br /></h3>
<p>FoEI’s<a href="resolveuid/b696371bc6ab3775cdcbcb21a924d5c7" class="internal-link" title="Forest and biodiversity program highlights in 2009"> Forests and Biodiversity Program</a> campaigns against illegal logging and deforestation, and works with communities and local people to uphold their rights to manage their forests. We also expose and oppose the negative impacts of monoculture plantations of crops such as sugar cane, palm oil and soy, planted to produce agrofuels. <br /><br />The Forests and Biodiversity program’s focus on strengthening and promoting sustainable local initiatives means that some of its key activities and successes occur at the national level. For example, in Uruguay Friends of the Earth successfully halted construction of the controversial pulp and paper mill proposed by ENCE who had been planning to invest US$1,500 million. In Malaysia, Friends of the Earth filed a lawsuit to save a water-catchment forest on the Jerai mountain in Kedah from a quarry project that has been illegally approved by the state government. The Indonesian President identified illegal logging as a form of entrenched corruption, saying that he appreciated the efforts of Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth which have been active in criticizing the forest management of his government. <br /><br />The Forests and Biodiversity Program is also focused on challenging and changing intergovernmental policies that already or potentially could contribute to the destruction of forests and biodiversity, For example, it participated in the Convention on Biological Diversity’s High-level Working Group on the 2010 biodiversity target and post-2010 target(s), and successfully persuaded governments to incorporate a number of key paragraphs into the final 2010 Biodiversity Targets. <br /><br />Collaborative side and parallel events during intergovernmental forums, including meetings of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations in Copenhagen, and the World Forestry Congress in Buenos Aires, were also successful in raising civil society’s concerns and challenging government perspectives. FoEI also produced a video about the performance of Finnish pulp and paper company Stora Enso in Uruguay, and created a photo exhibition on the impacts of cellulose/logging corporations in the Southern Cone of South America, which was exhibited at the World Forestry Congress. <br /><br />The program also participated in the 2009 World Social Forum in Belem, Brazil, co-hosting a workshop on plantations, market mechanisms and false solutions, with the Global Forest Coalition; and published "Community-based Forest Governance: from resistance to proposals for sustainable use."<br /><br /></p>
<h3>economic justice-resisting neoliberalism</h3>
<p>The <a href="resolveuid/0fb7a001bc90dc4dd07bccbfde244abb" class="internal-link" title="Economic Justice - Resisting Neoliberalism (ejrn) program">Economic Justice-Resisting Neoliberalism (EJRN) Program</a>’s objective is to build sustainable societies by building people’s power and dismantling corporate power, stopping corporate-led neo-liberalism and globalization, and challenging the institutions and governments that promote unequal and unsustainable economic systems. <br /><br />For example, through the European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ), which FoEI is a very active member of, the EJRN Program has developed legal proposals for corporate accountability and to improve OECD guidelines. The OECD now plans to revise its guidelines for multinational companies. The UN has also adopted the Ruggie Framework for Business and Human Rights, in response to pressure to improve its oversight of corporate behavior from civil society groups including FoEI. The EU has also started research into improving protection for developing country citizens, against the negative impacts of EU-based business.<br /><br />The EJRN Program also developed proposals for the EU and G-20 to regulate both EU lobbying and the financial sector. This included a campaign for the implementation of an EU lobby registry which has now been implemented (although it only calls for voluntary registration so far). FoE also convinced the European Commission that the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) had falsified its lobby expenditure report, and the Commission temporarily suspended CEFIC as a result. Additionally, FoE won a case with the European Ombudsman concerning EU officials that accepted gifts from companies they were supervizing. The EU is now preparing new rules on conflicts of interest.<br /><br />In 2009, FoE’s ‘Global Europe’ campaign called for the suspension of the EU-Peru trade negotiations, particularly over concerns about human rights violations. FoE also supported a delegation of representatives of Indigenous Peoples from Peru, Bolivia and Colombia, who toured European capitals to publicize the impacts of mining and biofuels. Although the negotiations have not yet been suspended, this collaborative campaign has so far resulted in a commitment from the European Commission that the Associated Agreement with Peru will not contain any provision which would be detrimental to the rights of indigenous people; and will contain proposals that guarantee that trade and economic development respect the environment, as well as a binding human rights clause.<br /><br />A focused effort to persuade Shell to improve its business practices continues to be a priority for FoEI. This has included support to FoE Nigeria in its campaign to expose the harmful nature of gas flaring, which contributed to the Nigerian foreign minister publicly committing to enforcing the ban on gas flaring as of January 2010. Efforts in Nigeria have been complemented by campaigning at the international level: FoEI collaborated with several organizations to publish "Shell's Big Dirty Secret," which documents Shell's continued investment in the dirtiest forms of energy and its position as the world's most carbon intensive oil company. An OECD complaint filed by FoE Netherlands resulted in a commitment by Shell to improve its oil depot in the Philippines and its communication with surrounding communities.<br /><br />In the US, the ShellGuilty campaign launched by FoEI, Oil Change and Platform London, finally saw justice done when Shell was forced to pay a US$15.5 million out-of-court settlement for its complicity in the 1995 murder of nine Nigerian activists who opposed its gas flaring, under the US Alien Tort Statute. <br /><br />On 3 December the Netherlands-based court case against Shell got under way in The Hague. The case has been brought by three Nigerian communities and FoE Netherlands/Miluedefensie over oil pollution in Nigeria.&nbsp;Shell&nbsp;asked the court to rule that the Dutch court has no jurisdiction over&nbsp;Shell&nbsp;Nigeria, but on 30 December the court held that the Dutch court does have jurisdiction. Given that&nbsp;Shell&nbsp;has now lost this point, an important hurdle has been overcome, and the 'real' lawsuit can begin. This is the first time in history that a Dutch company has been brought to trial in a Dutch court for damages occurring abroad.<br /><br />The EJRN Program was also very successful in strengthening hundreds of community individuals and activists across the world, including through the Third Annual Latin American Sustainability School, and community exchanges in Latin America. Many other publications and communications materials were published during the year.<br /><br /></p>
<h3>resisting mining oil and gas</h3>
<p>FoEI’s <a href="resolveuid/28ddcb725f1aeec0bf9b15f538ccd044" class="internal-link" title="Resisting oil, mining and gas program highlights 2009">Resisting Mining, Oil and Gas Program </a>is a new FoEI program, and groups are concentrating on planning joint campaign work and mapping FoEI’s current work with communities. Some international activities are also underway however, and these included a number of actions against Canadian open-pit mines on 22 July, in countries including Australia, Canada, Mexico and Thailand, to mark the Global Day of Action Against Open Pit Mining. Another important event was the "Conference on Extractive Industries: Blessing or Curse? Impacts of the Oil and Gas Industry," held by FoE Europe in Brussels in October.<br /><br />Some FoEI groups already have established campaigns on mining, oil and gas, resulting in some important national developments and successes. In December 2009, for example, FoE Hungary celebrated the introduction of a landmark ban on the use of cyanide in mining. FoE Philippines has filed an Alternative Mining Bill, intended to introduce a new mining policy to regulate the exploration, development and utilization of mineral resources. Many FoE groups, including in Indonesia, Guatemala, the Philippines, Ghana, Hungary and Costa Rica, are also working on an on-going basis with local communities affected by mining.<br /><br />Testimonies from mining communities also feature strongly in FoEI’s new media projects, as do videos on tin mining in Indonesia, and oil pollution in Nigeria, both of which can be seen on YouTube. FoEI also embarked on an ambitious project to create a series of video testimonies by women affected by large-scale metal mining.<br /><br />Friends of the Earth member groups continue to work on issues related to water, defending water territories for the benefit of communities and biodiversity. We work together with local communities in protecting the right to water, and opposing privatization of water and ‘development’ projects that pollute rivers and that use large quantities of water. Finally, we mobilize the public to vote for new laws and regulations that keep water in the public domain and uphold water as a human right.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Gender<br /></h3>
<p></p>
<p><a href="resolveuid/bef96fea3d66aa60819622740b4e8510" class="internal-link" title="gender highlights">FoEI’s gender program</a> focuses on deepening our understanding
of why the feminist perspective&nbsp;is critical to the FoEI federation. Such
an understanding can shed light on the ways in which the current neoliberal economic
model affects men and women differently, both in terms of its social and
environmental impacts. It also reveals the self-perpetuating nature of the
patriarchal society. For FoEI, a fuller comprehension of the harsh realities
faced by women in different countries and regions across the world will help us
construct better and more effective campaign strategies, and change the way we
ourselves act. A document on how to work from a gender perspective has already
been completed and circulated internally.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Together with allied social movements including La Via
Campesina (LVC) and the World March of Women (WMW), we aim to support women to
resist, transform and mobilize, both at the local and international levels, to
bring about the world they want to live in.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In 2009, we focused on integrating a gender analysis into our programs on Food Sovereignty and Economic Justice-Resisting Neoliberalism (EJRN), and to support the inclusion of a feminist perspective into the EJRN Program’s analysis of the global financial crisis. FoEI was also invited to participate in WMW’s Second Regional Encounter in the Americas, in August 2009, in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Gender campaigners also supported the production of video testimonies from ‘Women Re-sisters’, women resisting mining, some of which can currently be viewed on the <a class="external-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/FriendsoftheEarthInt">FoEI YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp; Friends of the Earth also participated in La Escuela de Formación de Dirigentas (a school for future women leaders) organized by the Coordinadora de Organizaciones del Campo (CLOC) and Via Campesina del Cono Sur, in Paraguay, in July 2009.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Friends of the Earth Uruguay/REDES has been particularly
active in promoting FoEI’s focus on gender, in terms of supporting the
international coordination of this complex and cross-cutting issue, providing
conceptual contributions, and engaging actively at the national level. In June 2009,
this included publication of a book that considers the impacts of forest monocultures and
soya on the displacement of rural populations, with a special emphasis on the
consequences for human rights and gender relations. FoE Uruguay also drafted
numerous papers on food sovereignty and gender concerns including a report on
the role of rural women in the defense of food sovereignty, based on
investigation and interviews with women from <em>la Red de Grupos de Mujeres Rurales</em> (the Network of Rural Women).</p>
<p>

</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-04-01T11:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/communications-in-2007/our-website/cyberaction-successes-in-2007http-www-foei-org-en-get-involved-take-action-maandagshoek">
    <title>cyberaction successes in 2007</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/communications-in-2007/our-website/cyberaction-successes-in-2007http-www-foei-org-en-get-involved-take-action-maandagshoek</link>
    <description>Cyberactivists from around the world helped us to achieve these victories throughout 2007. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><br /><img class="floatleft" src="resolveuid/e852f7e68671acc8fb534570e8838e01/image_preview" alt="cyberaction" /><strong>5 minutes respite for the planet</strong><br />On Thursday 1 February 2007 we participated in a global call for households and public buildings to to <a href="resolveuid/163b6920f3ba72db4a9ad3dcc9924214" class="internal-link" title="Switch off">switch off </a>the lights to give the plant 5 minutes of respite. The action was organized by Friends of the Earth France and the "Alliance for the Planet" (a coalition of French green NGOs and many others). The hugely popular action drew international attention - around 20 countries took part, switching off public monuments in Spain, Belgium, Canada, Italy, Germany, Australia and others and 1125 visits to the switch off web page in February. <br />http://www.foei.org/en/get-involved/take-action/switch-off/<br /><br /><strong>maandagshoek</strong><br />In May 2007 together with groundWork/Friends of the Earth South Africa we ran a cyberaction to support eighteen people who were arrested on in <a href="resolveuid/c4a0e583696aef94f4916be8a0692a04" class="internal-link" title="maandagshoek">Maandagshoek</a>, South Africa, and held for 7 days without acces to their legal right to bail hearing. 357 cyberactivists took part in an email actions. All 18 were released on 1 June 2007.<br /><br /><strong>donations for flood victims in colombia</strong><br />In July 2007 Friends of the Earth Colombia and Friends of the Earth International <a href="resolveuid/d1efb89adfc15c534ecb3a0dfe095e4e" class="internal-link" title="Sinu">appealed for donations</a> to help 20,000 people affected by flooding in Córdoba, Colombia. A total of Euro 320 was raised.<br /><br /><strong>amazonian madeira river</strong><br />In September 2007, International Rivers, Friends of the Earth Brazil and Friends of the Earth International <a href="resolveuid/739478df65a569ab7d2a1d0af90d5ee5" class="internal-link" title="amazonian dam project threatens bolivian biodiversity">ran a petition</a> to call for proper assessment of the environmental impacts on neighbouring countries of a plan by the Brazilian government to build two huge dams on the Madeira River, principal tributary of the Amazon, and a region of mega-biodiversity.<br />287 people from 44 countries signed the petition<br /><br /><strong>solidarity for burma</strong><br />In a joint action with Friends of the Earth Philippines we ran a petition calling for support and solidarity with the Burmese monks who were demonstrating against rising fuel and food prices that left many in Burma without access to public transport and unable to feed their families. <br />400 signatures were sent to the United Nations.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you would like to become a cyberactivist, please join <a href="resolveuid/df1025bc91146d8194105b5c4427c59c" class="internal-link" title="get involved">here</a>! <br /><br /><br /><br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-03-31T10:26:58Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/europe/france-201c5-minutes-of-rest-for-the-planet201d-a-huge-success">
    <title>france: “5 minutes of rest for the planet” a huge success</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/europe/france-201c5-minutes-of-rest-for-the-planet201d-a-huge-success</link>
    <description>Friends of the Earth France is pleased to announce that the recent “5 minutes of rest for the planet” action of February 1, 2007 was a huge success. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="floatleft" src="resolveuid/6dfd846eabb0a75db42cb7c889bf909d/image_preview" alt="France lights out" />According to the French Electricity Transport Network, more than three million homes took part in the action in France. A further four million homes were recorded as taking part in countries including Spain, Belgium, Canada, Italy, Germany, Japan, and Australia. <br /><br />Participants who took part made a symbolic gesture to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by switching off their lights for five minutes. In Paris, even the Eiffel Tower and some other major monuments switched off their lights. <br /><br />According to <a href="resolveuid/ad26de48e310ce66f72ca7fbe9230e57" class="internal-link" title="France">FoE France’s</a> director, Anne Bringault, "The action exceeded our expectations, and spread far beyond activist networks. This mainstream event confirms that people are very concerned and ready to act concretely, as shown by a TNS Sofres poll that 86 percent of French people are willing to reduce their electricity consumption."<br /><br />The drop in electricity use in France alone corresponded to the total consumption of the city of Marseille. <br /><br />More information <a title="external-link" href="http://www.amisdelaterre.org/3-millions-de-foyers-eteints-plus.html">here</a>.<br /><br /></p>
<div style="clear: left;">&nbsp;</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-03-31T10:26:58Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/europe/ewni-shamed-shell-abandons-wildlife-photo-sponsorship">
    <title>england, wales and northern ireland: shamed shell abandons wildlife photo sponsorship</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/europe/ewni-shamed-shell-abandons-wildlife-photo-sponsorship</link>
    <description>Since 2006, Britain’s most prestigious wildlife photography exhibit, the “Wildlife Photographer of the Year,” has been sponsored by Shell. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="floatleft" src="resolveuid/20b9de95ab6fb59360fbcc0fdb556005/image_preview" alt="Ewni shell sponsorship dropped" />Yet this is the corporation with ambitions to develop Arctic oil, also known for environmental destruction through its highly-polluting operations in Canada’s tar sands, and in the east Siberian island of Sakhalin. <br /><br />
This attempt at greenwash spurred a campaign to end Shell’s involvement. <a href="resolveuid/dc605e46ac357b28806adc3c8b0a8be0" class="internal-link" title="England Wales &amp; Northern Ireland">Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland</a>, along with many other groups and individuals, campaigned for two years to stop the hypocritical sponsorship. <br /><br />The campaign culminated with FoE England, Wales and Northern Ireland calling on members of the public to urge the Natural History Museum, which holds the exhibit, to find new sponsors. Nearly five thousand letters and emails were sent by FoE supporters to the director of the Natural History Museum, calling on him not to renew the sponsorship deal.<br /><br />In early 2008, the Natural History Museum announced that Shell is no longer the sponsor of the prestigious award.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Read more about FoE EWNI's <a title="external-link" href="http://www.foe.co.uk/campaigns/local_groups_and_campaigns/success_stories/">national victories</a> in 2007.</p>
<div style="clear: left;">&nbsp;</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-03-31T10:26:58Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/north-america/canada-holding-government-accountable-for-lack-of-climate-action">
    <title>canada: holding government accountable for lack of climate action</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2007/what-we-achieved-in-2007/member-group-victories/north-america/canada-holding-government-accountable-for-lack-of-climate-action</link>
    <description>Throughout 2007, Friends of the Earth Canada continued with litigation to hold the Canadian
government accountable for inaction on the Kyoto Protocol.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="floatleft" src="resolveuid/5e43e21a3ee62e1366a4bbe8a4575f4c/image_preview" alt="canada: holding government accountable for lack of climate action" />The organization's case is the first in the world to call for enforcement of the Kyoto Protocol.&nbsp; Represented by Ecojustice Canada and Paliare Roland Barristers, Friends of the Earth is seeking a declaration that the Environment Minister has not complied with provisions of the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act (KPIA), which require the Minister of the Environment to prepare a climate change plan and regulations setting out measures to ensure that Canada meets its Kyoto obligations. Friends of the Earth argues that the Minister's Plan does not meet the requirements of the KPIA, and requests that an order in the nature of mandamus be issued requiring the Minister to comply with the KPIA and to prepare a revised plan and regulations that meet the requirements of the Act.<br /><br /><a href="resolveuid/1f9728a09760e9e8760468a0540c1e2a" class="internal-link" title="Canada">Friends of the Earth Canada</a> initially filed a lawsuit in May 2007 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act alleging that Canada was "likely to violate" the Act's international air pollution provision. However, in June 2007, the opposition parties and Senate of Canada passed the KPIA into law requiring the Environment Minister to file a plan and issue draft and final regulations that would meet Canada's obligations under Article 3, paragraph 1 of the Kyoto Protocol. Canada's subsequent climate change plan, filed to comply with the KPIA, stuck with the Conservative's earlier strategy that leaves Canada's greenhouse gas emissions at almost 35% above the Kyoto target of 6% emission reduction by 2012.&nbsp; <br /><br />Friends of the Earth Canada's KPIA case raises the fundamental question of whether a Minister of the Crown is accountable for ignoring the will of Parliament.&nbsp; Friends of the Earth submits that the Minister of Environment has defied the will of Parliament and dispensed with the rule of law by refusing to comply with the mandatory requirements of the KPIA.&nbsp; <br /><br />A hearing date is anticipated in the spring of 2008.<br /><br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-03-31T10:26:58Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>





</rdf:RDF>
