<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/member-group-collections/nigeria/RSS">
  <title>nigeria</title>
  <link>http://www.foei.org</link>

  <description>
    
      
    
  </description>

  

  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2008-11-26T16:24:58Z</syn:updateBase>
        

  <image rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/summary-for-download"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/africa/nigeria-financing-gas-projects-poisoning-foods"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/africa/africa-opposing-land-grabs-agra-and-non-ecological-agriculture"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/europe/europe-challenging-oil-and-steel-giants"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/funding-and-membership-support/funding-and-membership-support"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/resisting-oil-mining-and-gas"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/financial-report-2009"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/publications-materials-audiovisual/our-biodiversity-our-lives"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/member-groups"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/media/journalist-trainings-communications-strategies"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/media/press-quotes"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/international-activities/challenging-the-gender-impacts-of-plantations"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/agrofuels/against-certification-of-monocoltures"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/agrofuels"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/agrofuels/agrofuels"/>
      
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/summary-for-download">
    <title>annual report 2009 - executive summary</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/summary-for-download</link>
    <description>Download a summarized version of the 2009 annual report.</description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-04T14:46:55Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>File</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/africa/nigeria-financing-gas-projects-poisoning-foods">
    <title>Nigeria: financing gas projects, poisoning foods</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/africa/nigeria-financing-gas-projects-poisoning-foods</link>
    <description>The West African Gas Pipeline (WAGP) is a 681-kilometre pipeline built to transport natural gas from Nigeria to Benin, Ghana and Togo. The World Bank and other project sponsors claim that the WAGP will help stop dangerous gas flaring in Nigeria, as well as improving the environment, providing cheap energy, and promoting regional integration. There is no evidence to support these claims however. In fact, the WAGP has brought further violence, social disruption and environmental devastation to Nigeria. A World Bank Inspection Panel found that gas flaring continues, in spite of the WAGP and the fact that the Nigerian courts have declared gas flaring illegal.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/923f79170b79765ded4345aa9daccf5e/image_preview" alt="nigeria-poison-foods" />Local women in the Niger Delta use oil companies’ gas flare sites to dry a popular cassava-based food, <em>kpokpo garri</em>. The oil corporations count this as an economic benefit for the local people, and use it as yet another reason to justify their continued presence in the area. But food processed in this way is poisoned, and harmful to human health.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The health impacts of gas flaring are already well documented. They emit a range of toxins, including mercury, benzene, lead, nitrogen oxide, sulphur dioxide and particulates. These lead to increased incidences of asthma, cancers and respiratory illnesses in children. The chemical benzene is especially hazardous, causing leukaemia and other blood-related diseases. Women approaching the flares and people eating the processed foods are especially at risk. In spite of these dangers, however, the Iwherekan community still has no pharmacy, no health care center and no hospital.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The toxins have also killed most of the fish that local communities used to rely on for sustenance, as well as defoliating vegetation and corroding infrastructure.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what happened</h3>
<p>As part of its ongoing opposition to oil and gas extraction in Nigeria, Friends of the Earth Nigeria / ERA, visited the Iwherekan, Uzere and Ozoro communities, all in Delta State. Campaigners spoke with women food processors, and held town hall meetings and consultations with community women, farmers, fisher folk and traders.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Together they shared information about the health impacts of using gas flares to dry food, and discussed traditional alternatives, such as drying <em>kpokpo garri </em>in the sun or in ovens. Friends of the Earth Nigeria also exposed the claims of World Bank and its consortium that the WAGP project would provide cheap energy, improve the environment, better the lot of the communities and promote regional development.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>From Friends of the Earth Nigera’s visits, consultations, and analysis, it was clear that only women are involved in the production of <em>kpokpo garri</em>. 97% of the women from Iwherekan Community and Uzere Community use the flare sites for drying <em>kpokpo garri</em>, which they consume or sell to neighbouring communities. Only 3% use sunlight. Some of the younger women could not remember any technique other than flare drying being used: the flares mean that the food can be dried more quickly and in larger quantities.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In the Ozoro community however, which also hosts a Shell flow station, the women still dry their kpokpo in the sun, and were able to talk to the other women about their traditional methods.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It was clear that the women using the gas flares were very aware that their health was at risk. They complained of rashes and itching, miscarriages, burns, and cases of continuous internal ‘heat’. They also confirmed that those who eat the <em>kpokpo</em> suffer discomfort and stomach aches. According to the women, some of their customers complain of discoloration and a strong smell of chemicals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what changed</h3>
<p>A detailed analysis of the data collected showed that the use of gas flares for food processing resulted in health problems including coughs, headaches, miscarriages, irregular menstrual cycles, skin diseases, fever, asthma, difficulty in breathing, rheumatism, arthritis and eye problems.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The project succeeded in popularizing locally proven and traditional methods of food processing. It raised local communities’ awareness of the environmental and social impacts of gas flaring, and the need for facilities for processing agricultural products. It heightened the struggle against gas flaring.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The project also helped strengthen people’s willingness to speak out. Shortly after the consultation the Iwherekan community sent a delegation to their State government to draw their attention to the fact that, though they are the co-host of Utorogu gas plants that feeds the nation and the WAGP, the community people still live in squalid conditions lacking even the most basic amenities.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what was learned</h3>
<p>The project was not without its difficulties. In the Iwherekan community the men kept trying to intervene in a (very well attended) women-only meeting. The presence of military personnel hovering around the consultation hall also created an atmosphere of insecurity.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ultimately though, the project was successful because of the goodwill of the communities visited. Without their support the project would have been very difficult to implement. It was also supported by the Host Communities Network of Nigeria.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>what next?</h3>
<p>There is an urgent need for further awareness-raising activities and meetings with local women, who are usually the ones involved in the production and processing of food. &nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It will also be important to heighten and further popularize the struggle against gas flaring. Oil companies must be held accountable for knowingly exposing local communities to toxins.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>with thanks to our funders: the dutch ministry of foreign affairs (dgis)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-04T12:25:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/africa/africa-opposing-land-grabs-agra-and-non-ecological-agriculture">
    <title>africa: opposing land grabs, agra and non-ecological agriculture</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/africa/africa-opposing-land-grabs-agra-and-non-ecological-agriculture</link>
    <description>Enormous tracts of land on the African continent have been turned over to transnational agribusinesses and others interested in maximizing profits by exporting agricultural products, including for agrofuels production. A combination of African governments’ expropriation of community land and new agricultural systems proposed by donor agencies has proven to be highly damaging to smallholders’ livelihoods and the environment.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/bcb53cfac3db19cb3b2181f51f6afe2f/image_preview" alt="africa-landgrab-meeting" />The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), established by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation from the US, considers the ‘development’ of agriculture in Africa under western parameters to be the best approach to overcoming hunger and poverty. They propose a new ‘green revolution’, which will include more access to agricultural markets, and research into new seed varieties. Although AGRA claims to support smallholder farmers, AGRA’s supporters are pushing incessantly for the deployment of genetically modified (GM) crops in Africa.<br /><br />The reality of the situation is that the combined plans of AGRA and the agrofuels companies threaten to erode Africa’s traditional systems of farming, and contaminate the seed base with engineered varieties. Yet there is low public awareness about AGRA, genetically modified crops, agrofuels and other initiatives promoted by the global North.</p>
<h3><strong><br /></strong></h3>
<h3><strong>what happened</strong></h3>
<p>Friends of the Earth Nigeria/ERA aims to address this dangerous trend by unmasking AGRA, unveiling the scourge of land grabs in Africa, building the resistance of communities, and promoting agro-ecological agriculture. Africa’s governments should be focusing on building the capacity and meeting the needs of the continent’s small-scale farmers. Particular attention needs to be paid to the plight of women farmers and to the promotion of ecological agriculture.<br /><br />Friends of the Earth Nigeria hosted a public conference “AGRA, Land Grabs and Non-Ecological Agriculture”, 20-23 October 2009 in Abuja, Nigeria. The meeting attracted a wide range of networks including Friends of the Earth groups in Africa and Friends of the Earth International’s Food Sovereignty Program, Third World Network (TWN), the African Biosafety Network (ABN) and the Coalition for the Protection of African Genetic Heritage (COPAGEN). It provided an excellent space for information sharing and myth busting.<br /><br />It was also a much-needed opportunity to promote genuine agrarian reform, which supports small-scale farming without the use of chemical fertilizers and inputs as proposed by AGRA and its allies. The groups collectively rejected the unsustainable use of Africa’s natural resources by agribusinesses. <br /><br />The conference also called for gender justice: women are marginalized on land rights-related issues in virtually all parts of Africa and have been left out of key policy formulation and decision-making processes.<br /><br />In relation to the conference, Friends of the Earth Nigeria also carried out fact-finding visits to communities and government agencies, and coordinated their activities with other civil society organizations.</p>
<h3><strong><br /></strong></h3>
<h3><strong>what changed</strong></h3>
<p>The conference had a huge impact. It was an excellent platform for groups to exchange ideas and brace themselves for the struggle against AGRA, GM crops and the scramble for Africa’s arable land. <br /><br />Groups committed themselves to joint work, and began to plan common activities. Knowledge of ecological agriculture and community resistance strategies was greatly enhanced, enabling community based groups (farmers and others) to protect their biodiversity and sustain their livelihoods more effectively. It also allowed participants to examine and compare the situation in various countries. It brought different organizations and regional networks together and strengthened ties between Friends of the Earth groups and with others. <br /><br />The conference also generated considerable media interest, and many reports on the conference have been published, in the Nigerian media and elsewhere.<br /><br />It also helped to build support for FoE Nigeria’s memorandum to Nigerian lawmakers on the draft Nigerian Biosafety bill, sent in December 2009. An expanding network of organizations is now actively opposing problematic provisions in the draft bill.</p>
<h3><strong><br /></strong></h3>
<h3><strong>what was learned</strong></h3>
<p>The conference clearly showed that agrarian reform in Africa should come from within Africa, not from an invasion of the continent by foreign commercial interests.<br /><br />It also illustrated that great results can be achieved when groups come together and are united for a common purpose.</p>
<h3><strong><br /></strong></h3>
<h3><strong>what next</strong></h3>
<p>Many further activities are planned, including in terms of disseminating the results of the conference. Real alternatives such as agro-ecological agriculture will be promoted, and local groups will be encouraged to make links with other like-minded groups and organizations.<br /><br /><span style="line-height: normal;" class="Apple-style-span">FoE Nigeria plans to host a conference that will consider "The Politics of Hunger" from 16-19 November 2010, in Abuja,&nbsp;<span style="background-image: initial; background-color: rgb(34, 160, 211); color: rgb(206, 226, 234);" class="il">Nigeria</span>.&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: normal;" class="Apple-style-span">The object of this conference is to look at the links between&nbsp;the push to introduce GMOs into Africa, and the politics around hunger in Africa. The conference will also examine the potential impacts of the promotion of GMOs in Africa, the neglect of agro-ecological agriculture, climate change, food aid and environmental damage due to human agency. &nbsp;It will also analyze the connection between&nbsp;climate change&nbsp;and food deficits in&nbsp;<span style="background-image: initial; background-color: rgb(34, 160, 211); color: rgb(206, 226, 234);" class="il">Nigeria</span>&nbsp;specifically and Africa in general.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: normal;" class="Apple-style-span">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p><em>with thanks to our funders: hivos and the isvara foundation</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Marta Zogbi</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-03T08:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/europe/europe-challenging-oil-and-steel-giants">
    <title>european groups: challenging oil and steel giants</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/europe/europe-challenging-oil-and-steel-giants</link>
    <description>Friends of the Earth Europe is campaigning to raise awareness about the impacts of extractive industries. Many developing countries have large reserves of natural resources, such as oil, gas, coal, gold and copper. But decades of irresponsible oil, mining and gas exploration have produced devastating social and environmental effects in many developing countries.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/a43947500a53cfaf4f1c7daf3ed84fd8/image_preview" alt="gas-flaring-protest" />For example, oil and gas pipeline construction in Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Chad, Georgia, Russia and Turkey is damaging the environment and exhausting scarce resources including land, fishing grounds and forests. All of these are critical for the livelihoods of local populations. Gas flaring in countries such as Nigeria, Indonesia and Kazakhstan emits thousands of tons of toxic emissions, resulting in high levels of atmospheric pollution and damaged crops, as well as respiratory, skin, genetic and other serious ailments. There are many other examples.<br /><br />Nonetheless, the international financial institutions continue to co-finance investments in the major oil firms, even though these businesses are extraordinarily lax when it comes to complying with international and local laws and standards, and even their own codes of conduct.&nbsp;Toxic waste, oil spills, leaking pipelines, water pollution and depletion, land contamination, permafrost damage, wildlife disturbance, deforestation, infectious diseases, damaged crops and farmlands, and human rights abuses are the result. <br /><br />In May 2008, four Nigerian citizens, Friends of the Earth Netherlands and Friends of the Earth Nigeria filed a unique lawsuit against Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell. The Nigerians, fishermen and farmers, suffer major damage from oil spills because of oil production by Shell. On 3 December 2009 the case finally started at the court in The Hague. Shell asked the court to rule that the Dutch court has no jurisdiction over Shell Nigeria, but on 30 December the court ruled against Shell: the Dutch court does have jurisdiction over Shell Nigeria. The case continues.<br /><br />As part of its extractives industries campaign, Friends of the Earth Europe also published a report ‘ArcelorMittal: Going nowhere slowly,’ in May 2009. Friends of the Earth campaigners, as part of the European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ), gained first-hand experience of the social and environmental impacts of the global steel giant at its steel mill in Vanderbijlpark, South Africa. The group met community spokespersons, farmers, workers and ex-workers, unionists and ArcelorMittal representatives, and heard a story of human rights abuses and environmental and social injustice. The resulting report highlights the fact that despite the company’s rhetoric, it continues to destroy the environment, risk people’s lives and displace local communities.<br /><br />Friends of the Earth Europe also published several other climate-related reports in 2009, focusing on the oil and gas industry. These included reports in both May and June demonstrating that Shell makes a colossal contribution to global climate change and dirty forms of energy, and has now become the most carbon intensive oil company in the world. <br /><br />A further report, also published in May, provides an overview of all forms of public money spent on the production and primary processing of fossil fuels (oil, gas and coal) since 2004, in France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the European Union.<br /><br />To follow the Shell court case go to: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.shellcourtcase.org">www.shellcourtcase.org</a><br /><br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-07-26T09:38:59Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/funding-and-membership-support/funding-and-membership-support">
    <title>funding and membership support</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/funding-and-membership-support/funding-and-membership-support</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3>contributions from our members</h3>
<p>12 percent of the funding for Friends of the Earth International comes&nbsp;from the membership dues paid by the member groups, and 0.7&nbsp;percent&nbsp;comes from sales and donations. Member groups contribute a&nbsp;percentage of their income on the basis of their revenue from two years&nbsp;ago to the international network. This core funding is used to cover the</p>
<p>operational costs of the Secretariat.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>subsidies</h3>
<p>86.5 percent of our income is subsidies received from&nbsp;government agencies and foundations. These funds are granted&nbsp;</p>
<p>to us for&nbsp;specific projects and campaigns and for our Membership Support Fund.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>membership support fund</h3>
<p>Our Membership Support Fund seeks to pool resources and&nbsp;share them across FoE member groups for the following&nbsp;</p>
<p>objectives: network&nbsp;development, program coordination, capacity building,&nbsp;strengthening national campaigns, and increasing&nbsp;participation in international campaigns.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In 2009, we distributed 995,266 Euros to 32 of our members:&nbsp;Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica,&nbsp;Croatia, Cyprus, El Salvador, England, Wales &amp; Northern&nbsp;Ireland, Ghana, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Indonesia,&nbsp;Liberia, Malaysia, Malawi,Mozambique, Netherlands, Nigeria, Palestina, Papua New&nbsp;Guinea, Paraguay, Peru,&nbsp;Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Togo,&nbsp;Tunesia, Uganda and&nbsp;Uruguay.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We also distributed 106,142 Euros to the our regional&nbsp;groupings for regional meetings and capacity building.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>our funders</h3>
<p>Friends of the Earth International gratefully acknowledges&nbsp;financial support from:</p>
<ul><li><a href="resolveuid/2668ff8909ccfafe9c6e4dcbb6d2781f" class="internal-link" title="hivos"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">HIVOS</span></a></li><li><a href="resolveuid/a62c0ab4ba2abaa8bea03144666e9ca8" class="internal-link" title="oxfam novib"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">NOVIB/Oxfam Netherlands</span></a></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span"><a href="resolveuid/d5ebc3f0e9640f2ba3ac2144cd6d496c" class="internal-link" title="The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs">The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs</a> (DGIS-TMF/MFS)</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span"><a href="resolveuid/d5ebc3f0e9640f2ba3ac2144cd6d496c" class="internal-link" title="The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs">The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs</a> (Matra)</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span"><a href="resolveuid/d9695e4d99cf35ae77dc71c27021610b" class="internal-link" title="europeaid">The European Union</a> (joint grant with IPS)</span></li><li><a href="resolveuid/712b74a16a33bf8575a9c62fec2ab6a9" class="internal-link" title="The Sigrid Rausing Trust"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">The Sigrid Rausing Trust</span></a></li><li><a href="resolveuid/42107955aababe60a664a086909994e2" class="internal-link" title="The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation</span></a></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span"><a href="resolveuid/51e90fb9e45b649da3238ee5671d9b93" class="internal-link" title="The Netherlands Committee for Sustainable Development">The Netherlands Committee for Sustainable Development</a>&nbsp;(NCDO)</span></li><li><a href="resolveuid/e11b4312a4ddd6d24cedaeab398edf87" class="internal-link" title="The Isvara Foundation"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">The Isvara Foundation</span></a></li><li><a href="resolveuid/9db8c3486be122e2cb60b79113b96b1e" class="internal-link" title="The C.S. Mott Foundation"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">The C.S. Mott Foundation</span></a></li><li><a href="resolveuid/54fcea98f33f84c300bb5acd3ecbe7e9" class="internal-link" title="The Wallace Global Fund"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">The Wallace Global Fund</span></a></li><li><a href="resolveuid/ac771c01294d71f0f2d63c38f5cc418d" class="internal-link" title="The Rockefeller Brothers Fund"><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">The Rockefeller Brothers Fund</span></a></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span"><a href="resolveuid/092d23d42c55ea4cd3439d145d24d509" class="internal-link" title="The V. Kahn-Rasmussen Foundation">The V. Kahn-Rasmussen Foundation</a></span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Their financial support has been crucial in strengthening&nbsp;our campaigns&nbsp;and our network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-06T10:06:52Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/resisting-oil-mining-and-gas">
    <title>Resisting oil, mining and gas program highlights</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/resisting-oil-mining-and-gas</link>
    <description>The Resisting Mining, Oil and Gas Program is based on a vision in which the world does not depend on minerals, oil and gas. Its objective is to dismantle corporate control over minerals, oil and gas, and to stop the destruction and violations of communities and ecosystems.
</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/8b1c52368daa275623c3a129ea7ee4d0/image_preview" alt="IMG_6508 USED RMOG.JPG" />The Resisting Mining, Oil and Gas (RMOG) Program is a new FoEI program, and groups are concentrating on mapping FoEI’s current work with communities, as well as planning joint campaign work on mining, oil and gas corporations. Work on a campaigning manual on resisting mining, oil and gas is already underway; and the RMOG Program has also agreed to establish a campaign against Holcin, a cement, aggregates and concrete transnational corporation. An international campaign against Goldcorp is also planned.<br /><br />Some collaborative international activities are also underway. On 22 July, Friends of the Earth groups participated in a number of actions against Canadian open-pit mines, in countries including Australia, Canada, Mexico and Thailand, to mark the Global Day of Action Against Open Pit Mining on 22 July. <br /><br />Another important event was the Conference on "Extractive Industries: Blessing or Curse? Impacts of the Oil and Gas Industry," held by FoE Europe in Brussels on 13 October. The conference focused on the environmental, climate and social impacts of oil and gas industry operations; the sustainable use of natural resources; accountability for damages; financial subsidies; an assessment of the oil and gas industry’s performance in relation to poverty eradication and environmental impacts; and case studies on Canadian tar sands, Arctic oil exploration, and the impacts of European oil and gas operations in Nigeria and Russia. The conference was a great success, and was given coverage on the BBC's Record Europe show. A photo exhibit showing the negative impact of extractive industries was also shown in France and Italy.<br /><br />FoEI co-sponsored an event on Climate Change, Debt and Dissent, organized by Oilwatch South America and the Southern Peoples Creditors Alliance, 9-12 October 2009, in Quito, Ecuador. FoE Nigeria currently hosts the secretariat of Oilwatch Africa, and participated in the event, together with FoE Costa Rica. <br /><br />Testimonies from mining communities also featured in FoEI’s new media projects. For example, a series of women from Sulawesi, Indonesia share their stories and struggles resisting mining activities by Canadian nickel mining corporation Vale Inco. The Chief of Mbikikiki village talks about water pollution caused by the construction of the Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline owned by Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Petronas. Ada Zuñiga Hernandez from Honduras talks about the health impacts of mining activities by Canadian corporation, Goldcorp Inc, and a woman from Peru describes the feared destruction of an area because of plans by another Canadian company, Manhattan Minerals, to develop a gold mine in Tambogrande. A video produced by FoE Indonesia and FoE Netherlands that shows how tin mining in Indonesia is wrecking forests and coral reefs, and another short FoE Netherlands movie about oil pollution in Nigeria, "Back to Nature Travels Nigeria," can both be seen on YouTube. <br /><br />FoEI also embarked on an ambitious project to create a series of video testimonies of women affected by large-scale metal mining. These 'Women Re-Sisters' are strong, impressive women who talk about the impacts of mining on their lives: their food, health, water, economic situation, land, families and personal security. They also share strategies for resistance and mobilization. Testimonies from women affected by mining in Bulgaria and Guatemala can currently be viewed on the FoEI YouTube channel. With deep respect and recognition for the work of the participating groups, and the sisters who were brave enough to feature in these films.<br /><br />In 2009, FoEI groups around the world continued their national and regional campaigns against mining, oil and gas. Africa is focusing on conducting research into mining, shedding light on its negative effects. Asia also continues its struggle to support communities that resist mining. There have been some significant achievements.<br /><br />In the Netherlands, for example, the first court hearing in the case against Shell, brought by&nbsp;four Nigerian victims of Shell oil leaks&nbsp;and FoE Netherlands is now underway. On 3 December 2009, this unique legal action started at the court in The Hague. Shell asked the court to rule that the Dutch court has no jurisdiction over Shell Nigeria. But on 30 December the court held that the Dutch court does have jurisdiction over the operations of Shell Nigeria. Given that Shell has now lost this point, an important hurdle has been overcome, and the 'real' lawsuit can begin. This is the first time in history that a Dutch company has been brought to trial in a Dutch court for damages occurring abroad. FoEI also collaborated with several organizations to publish "Shell's Big Dirty Secret," which documents Shell's continued investment in the dirtiest forms of energy and its position as the world's most carbon intensive oil company. <br /><br />In the US, the ShellGuilty campaign launched by FoEI, Oil Change and Platform London, finally saw justice done in 2009. After legal battles lasting nearly fourteen years, oil giant Royal Dutch Shell has also been forced to pay a US$15.5 million out-of-court settlement. Plaintiffs from the Ogoni region of the Niger Delta have successfully held Shell accountable for complicity in human rights atrocities committed against the Ogoni people in the 1990s, including the execution of writer and activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. <br /><br />Some FoEI groups aim to change national mining laws through advocacy and legal routes. In December 2009, for example, FoE Hungary celebrated the introduction of a landmark ban on the use of cyanide in mining ten years after the tragic Baia Mare spill. It was passed with a virtually unprecedented majority. FoE Philippines has filed an Alternative Mining Bill, now known as House Bill 6342. The bill is intended to scrap and replace the Mining Act of 1995 and introduce a new mining policy to regulate the exploration, development and utilization of mineral resources and to ensure the equitable sharing of benefits, including for the State, indigenous peoples and local communities. <br /><br />Many FoE groups, including those seeking to change legislation, are working with local communities affected by mining to challenge the presence of specific mining and extraction companies more directly. For example:</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In January 2009, FoE Indonesia sent a complaint to Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, following the Australian government’s failure to fulfil a promise to respond directly to Indonesian organizations challenging the activities of Australian mining companies. FoE Indonesia has compiled a dossier detailing the involvement of numerous Australian mining companies in environmental destruction and human rights violations.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In February 2009, communities in Guatemala asked the legislature and the Ministry of Energy and Mines to issue a moratorium on mining licenses of all types, until reforms to the Mining Act are agreed with them. Social organizations in the affected municipalities claim that current amendments to the document do not provide for community interests.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Also in February, and after years of being marginalized in relation to decisions about their ancestral lands, the Subanon people on Mindanao island came another step closer to asserting control over their territory. Their lands are currently being exploited by TVI Resource Development Phils (TVIRDI), a subsidiary of Canadian mining company TVI Pacific. Around 20 Subanon Indigenous People and farmers living within the TVIRDI mining area in Mount Canatuan, the Subanon tribe’s sacred site, halted blasting and drilling activities at the Canadian company’s open-pit mining operation, after a successful occupation of the site.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In March 2009, the Ghana National Coalition on Mining, a group of communities affected by mining in Ghana and civil society organizations including FoE Ghana, opposed the Ghanaian Environmental Protection Agency, which had granted environmental permits to Newmont Ghana Gold Limited and Adamus Resources to conduct surface gold mining activities.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In September 2009, FoE Hungary published their first annual alternative report on the Hungarian Oil Company (MOL). The report held a mirror up to the company’s annual report and assessed the company’s activities in 2008. After examining company data, the authors gave examples showing that the company’s practices do not actually match up to its rhetoric.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Also in September, FoE Costa Rica, together with and as part of Costa Rica’s popular movement, participated in a visit to mining company Crucitas, organized by the Supreme Court of Costa Rica, which had suspended Crucitas’s mining permit. There is a risk that the Supreme Court will favor the mining company, in which case FoE Costa Rica plans more mobilizations across the country, to stop this mining company restarting its activities.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Again in September, FoE Guatemala organized an international mission to verify violations of human, environmental and economic rights by mining transnational corporations operating in Guatemala, such as GoldCorp. The aim of the mission was to ensure that the voices of victims, who are criminalized in Guatemala, can be heard at the international level. Participants included FoE Uruguay, FoE El Salvador, and FoE Costa Rica, together with people from Amnesty International and others.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<p><br />Building strong networks and alliances against the mining and extractive industries is also a priority for the RMOG Program. For example, a new network in Colombia, the Colombian Network Against Mining, has been established to challenge transnational corporations operating in Colombia with the support of the Colombian government. One of the first acts of this network was to support the demands of workers and the population struggling against British Petroleum in Tauramena, Colombia.<br /><br />Many other critical activities were also undertaken by the Federation in 2009. For example:</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In Nigeria, the Second National Consultation on the Environment, 25 - 26 November 2009, saw civil society leaders, community-based organizations, civil society organizations, development experts, academia, legal practitioners, the media and representatives of government agencies come together to consider a post-petroleum Nigeria. The event was organized by FoE Nigeria in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Environment.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">FoE Philippines and Alyansa Tigil Mina co-hosted a discussion on "Tracing the Gold, Tracing the Money," in Cagayan de Oro City on 29 June. The event was designed to give participants the knowledge and skills they need to find out how mining companies finance their activities and where they sell their products. This kind of research often reveals excellent intervention points for advocates wanting to stop mining operations in their localities.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">A new report from FoE Netherlands, "Mining Matters," which was published in June 2009, reviewed practices used in mining tin (in Indonesia, Bolivia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Burma), bauxite (Guinea and Jamaica), and copper (Chile, Peru, Zambia and Indonesia (Grasberg)). It also examined the policies of seven companies using imported metals in the Netherlands.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Security forces arrested the director of FoE Indonesia and the Head of FoE Indonesia's Regional Department&nbsp;during a peaceful protest organized by FoE Indonesia and other NGOs together with fisherfolk organizations. The groups organized an event parallel to the World Ocean Conference (WOC) and Coal Triangle Summit 2009 which was held in Manado, Indonesia, 11-14 May. The peoples’ gathering was to draw the attention of WOC to small fisherfolks’ concerns – especially their call to ban the dumping of tailing minings into the sea - and to demand that these concerns be put on the WOC’s agenda.</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">In 2009 Young FoE Norway’s priority campaign was against oil drilling off the beautiful Lofoten Islands, home to the world’s largest stock of cod and biggest cold water coral reef. They started several local groups in a network called "O`olkaction against oil drilling outside the Lofoten Islands." They also took a group of representatives from political youth parties out to the Lofoten Islands for one week, to highlight the fact that there are other possibilities besides drilling for oil in Northern Norway.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">FoE France has published a synthesis report "Public subsidies to fossil fuels in France and the European Union," which reveals that the wealthy oil industry benefited from French subsidies of over €400 million between 2004 and 2008, mainly in the form of export guarantees. FoE’s research also shows that €6 billion of European money has been given to the fossil fuel industry over the past five years.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<p><br />The main areas of work of the program are:</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Community Resistance</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Campaign Against Corporations</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Policies and Mechanisms that Promote Mining, Oil and Gas</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Decreasing Consumption to Stop Demand for Mining, Oil and Gas</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>coordinators and participants</h3>
<p>Co-coordinator: Natalia Atz Sunuc, FoE Guatemala<br />Co-coordinator: Romel Cardenas de Vera, FoE Philippines<br /><br />The RMOG steering group includes:<br /><br /></p>
<ul><li>For Africa, Chima Williams, FoE Nigeria</li><li>For APac, Natalie Lowrey, Australia</li><li>For ATALC, Andres Idarraga, Colombia</li><li>For Europe, Geert Ritsema, Netherlands</li><li>For North America, Adina Matisoff, FoE USA</li></ul>
<p><br />This is a new FoEI program and the co-coordinators and steering group are still in the processing of developing and implementing a fully-fledged strategy and workplan. Groups that have expressed an interest in participating include: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Curacao, El Salvador, FoE Europe, EWNI, France, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Japan, Liberia, Malawi, Malaysia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Togo and the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-07-23T11:25:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/financial-report-2009">
    <title>financial report 2009</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/financial-report-2009</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-19T07:50:43Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>File</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/publications-materials-audiovisual/our-biodiversity-our-lives">
    <title>our biodiversity, our lives photo competition and calendar</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/publications-materials-audiovisual/our-biodiversity-our-lives</link>
    <description>Friends of the Earth International ran our fourth annual photo competition in 2009 on the theme of "Our Biodiversity, Our Lives" to mark the occasion of the United Nations' International Year of Biodiversity in 2010. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/cc179f3dcfa1bc0217f4e0436a7daffb/image_preview" alt="calendar-cover-10" /></p>
<p>More than 1,200 photos were received from 79 countries around the world, from amateur and professional photographers ranging in age from 11 to 73 years old.<br /><br /></p>
<h3>The judges for the competition were:</h3>
<ul><li>Bangladeshi photographer G.M.B. Akash, first-place winner of
last year's photo competition and cover photographer of the 2007
calendar (www.gmb-akash.com).</li><li>Peter Menzel, US photo journalist and author of "Hungry Planet: What The World Eats" (www.menzelphoto.com).</li><li>Akintunde Akinleye, first-place winner World Press Photo 2007 in "Spot News" category, from Nigeria (www.akintunde1.com).</li><li>Daniel
Beltrá, Seattle-based Spanish environmental and nature photography
specialist and winner of the 2007 World Press Photo prize for his work
on soy plantations and Amazon deforestation (www.danielbeltra.com).</li><li>Indian photographer Shantanu Das, first-place winner of the 2008 Friends of the Earth International photo competition.</li><li>Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth Costa Rica/COECOCeiba</li><li>Kokou Elorm Amegadzé and Ekue Assem, Friends of the Earth Togo</li><li>Shamila Ariffin, Friends of the Earth Malaysia/Sahabat Alam Malaysia</li><li>Danielle van Oijen, Friends of the Earth Netherlands/Milieudefensie</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="image-left" src="resolveuid/f92f5d962fc2da32f75538ac813811a3/image_preview" alt="calendar-pic-09" height="234" width="350" />Our calendar for 2010, entitled 'Our Biodiversity, Our Lives', features
12 stunning photographs celebrating the planet's biodiversity and the
people who are working to sustain it. <span id="parent-fieldname-description">The photographs cover a diverse
range of subjects, from deforestation in Indonesia to tree planting in
Guatemala, polluted waters in north India to marine conservation in the South. The calendar documents the problems but also highlights
how communities are working together to find solutions.</span></p>
<p><br /><span id="parent-fieldname-description"></span></p>
<p>The calendar is A4 in size (210 × 297 mm), is
trilingual (English, French and Spanish) and is one of very few printed
on 100% recycled post consumer paper.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The majority of the photographs for the calendar were taken by the winners of our
2009 photography competition.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="resolveuid/74c6ca62bf73358c95d463b73d57edcf" class="internal-link" title="the 2009 photo competition">View all the winning images and find out how you can take part in next year's competition.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="resolveuid/531388ea64bc319528ea5f562e597f3b" class="internal-link" title="the winners 2008 photo competition"><br /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>AnnDoherty</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-07-05T16:20:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/member-groups">
    <title>member groups</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/member-groups/member-groups</link>
    <description>Friends of the Earth International is made up of the activities and actions of our 76 member groups, and it is our mission to support and strengthen their work at the local level. </description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/2722d6125dc160e8a811cffbcb5d6400/image_preview" alt="germany member groups" />These groups mobilize people, resist socially and environmentally damaging projects and policies, and help to transform their societies in tens of countries around the world. Their local work in turn allows us to campaign on the regional and international levels, and to seek political support for the rights of people everywhere to sustainable livelihoods and for social, economic, gender and environmental justice.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<h3>membership support</h3>
<div>In 2009, we conducted many activities to support the development of our member groups, as we understand that the strength of FoEI lies in the strength of our member organizations, their capacity to win victories at the local and national level, relate their struggles in a global context, and act in solidarity with fellow member groups in other countries and across regions.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Our Membership Support Fund seeks to pool resources and share them across FoE member groups for the following objectives: network development, capacity building, strengthening national campaigns, and increasing participation in international campaigns.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>In 2009, we distributed €995,266 to 32 of our members: Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, El Salvador, England, Wales &amp; Northern Ireland, Ghana, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Indonesia, Liberia, Malaysia, Malawi, Mozambique, Netherlands, Nigeria, Palestina, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda and Uruguay.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>We also distributed €106,142 to the our regional groupings for regional meetings and capacity building</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Other areas of membership development are the facilitation of relationship building among member groups across regions; helping to overcome language barriers through timely translations; creating spaces for sharing experiences, such as exchanges and gatherings; and ensuring that member groups are really able to engage in the federation and don't fall off the map.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-06-10T09:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/media/journalist-trainings-communications-strategies">
    <title>training for campaigners, communicators, and journalists</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/media/journalist-trainings-communications-strategies</link>
    <description>In April 2009, Friends of the Earth International organized a one-day training for campaigners in Amsterdam, in the Netherlands, during which participants started developing a federation-wide communications strategy on food sovereignty. During a skill-share, participants also improved their media messaging skills.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/2b34330c768cb86942722eaa6dcb3c52/image_preview" alt="comms training.jpg" />The training, which included a hands-on session with camcorder
interviews reviewed on-screen, was delivered in partnership with<a href="resolveuid/5a538453f71031d12101491c7e47a1eb" class="internal-link" title="partnership with ips news agency"> IPS
news agency</a>.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Friends of the Earth International also organized two separate trainings in Brussels, Belgium, in September 2009. One was for journalists and the other for&nbsp;non-profit&nbsp;communications staff. The two target groups also participated in a joint session, sharing their experiences and opinions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The communicators' training was delivered to 18 spokespeople and communicators from NGOs, mostly from European FoEI groups. Participants discussed and practiced the skills and tools needed to reach specific target audiences and media outlets with their messages.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The journalists' training was delivered to 14 accredited journalists from important mainstream media outlets based in the EU (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Poland and Slovakia). It provided them with useful tools with which to produce news stories related to climate justice and biodiversity in Europe and in developing countries.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The journalists' training included presentations about climate and biodiversity-related issues in Nigeria, Paraguay, Uruguay and Colombia. Journalist participants were particularly interested in these presentations from developing countries, and most of them produced related stories in the following months.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The vast majority of journalists attending stated that their ability to report on climate change issues had improved considerably following the training. 90% stated that they were interested in attending other workshops on sustainable development issues organized by FoEI.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;<em><img class="image-left" src="resolveuid/41de21b94d4634bda8b06f48ab32570c/image_mini" alt="eu-flag" height="50" width="75" /></em>These trainings were possible thanks to the financial assistance of the European Union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-04-14T20:20:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/media/press-quotes">
    <title>selected media quotes from 2009</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/communications/media/press-quotes</link>
    <description>In 2009, hundreds of news stories quoting Friends of the Earth messages were published and aired by a broad spectrum of media organizations, ranging from the world's leading newspapers and TV news programs such as the Financial Times and CNN, through to alternative news sources like the IPS news agency and Indymedia. 

The following selected quotes are from stories published during the year.
</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="image-inline" src="resolveuid/781f597bf460b96f38e68298015d93fc/image_preview" alt="communicators training.jpg" height="173" width="261" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"It wasn't an oil spill that made Nnimmo Bassey an environmentalist.
It was a massacre — the 1990 assault by Nigeria's armed forces on the
village of Umuechem, where residents of the oil-rich Niger Delta had
accused the Shell Petroleum Development Company of environmental
degradation and economic neglect."</p>
<p><em>TIME magazine feature about Friends of the Earth International
Chair Nnimmo Bassey, who was nominated a 'Hero of the Environment 2009.' </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"As chief executive of the Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers
Association (BELA) for the past six years, Syeda Rizwana Hasan has
struggled to bring better environmental and labor regulation to
Bangladesh's 36 shipbreaking yards, where, she says, "nobody is
present" to ensure labor laws are followed or international guidelines
against toxic waste-dumping are met."</p>
<p><em>TIME magazine feature about Friends of the Earth Bangladesh/BELA Chief Executive Syeda Rizwana Hasan who was nominated a 'Hero of
the Environment 2009.' </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"Other countries are using the US's [climate change
negotiations] position as an opportunity to try and avoid stringent
legally binding emissions cuts which they should implement at home."</p>
<p><em>BBC news, 9 October 2009</em><em>, quoting Meena Raman, Honorary Secretary, Friends of the Earth Malaysia.</em></p>
<p><em><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></em></p>
<p><em><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></em></p>
<p>"It is a crisis of democracy when campaigning charities like Friends of the Earth are prevented from speaking up on behalf of communities around the globe within the [UN Climate Change] talks themselves. This draconian measure is completely unjustified - the Copenhagen conference is fast becoming an international shambles."</p>
<p><em>The Telegraph, 17 December 2009, quoting </em><em>Andy Atkins, Executive Director of Friends of the Earth, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.</em><br /><br /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"The World Bank should be greening its energy portfolio. It's difficult to understand why the World Bank or Norway would be pouring money into an unproven [carbon capture and storage] technology ... rather than pour money into renewable technologies."<br /><em>The New York Times, 14 October 2009, quoting </em><em>Karen Orenstein, Friends of the Earth US International Policy Campaigner.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"Isaac Rojas, co-ordinator of the forest and biodiversity programme at Friends of the Earth International, said: "All over the world, plantations destroy the lands and livelihoods of local communities and indigenous peoples, as well as biodiversity and water resources. They also store less carbon than natural forests. Friends of the Earth International and the Global Forest Coalition want the UN's Committee on Forestry to stop promoting plantations and to urge governments immediately to halt the conversion of forests into biofuel plantations."<br /><em>The Independent, 25 October 2009. </em><br /><br /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>"We cannot allow carbon traders to damage the world. There is no such thing as clean coal or clean crude. Leave the oil in the soil, leave the coal in the hole. To those who want to pollute at home and plant a tree somewhere we say no." <br /><em>Agence France Presse, December </em><em>12, 2009, quoting </em><em>Nnimmo Bassey, Friends of the Earth International Chair.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />"For non-governmental organisations like Madre Tierra [Friends of the Earth Honduras], the 2009 coup in Honduras represents the consolidation of historical exploitation - led by the country’s long-standing oligarchy that controls approximately 80 per cent of Honduran wealth - and a worsening of the situation for the poorest and most vulnerable people in Honduras."<br /><em>Red Pepper magazine, 24 September 2009, published a story by Juan Almendares, director of Movimiento Madre Tierra/Friends of the Earth Honduras.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>PhilLee</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-06T14:23:19Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/international-activities/challenging-the-gender-impacts-of-plantations">
    <title>challenging the gender impacts of plantations</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/international-activities/challenging-the-gender-impacts-of-plantations</link>
    <description>In many countries in the global South, vast tracts of land are being converted to tree plantations to provide commodities such as rubber, palm oil and woodpulp for consumers in the global North.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p><img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/b392a263d7eb2686a159ddab546d1108/image_preview" alt="challenging the gender impacts of plantations" width="300" />As well as destroying biodiversity and robbing communities of land needed to grow food, plantations cause chemical pollution that can affect people’s health. These impacts are not gender neutral. While whole communities suffer, women are affected the most.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h4>what happened?</h4>
<p>Friends of the Earth International members in <a href="resolveuid/36f7dfd459be077487ffea564d57ab4b" class="internal-link" title="papua new guinea">Papua New Guinea</a>, <a href="resolveuid/9afe7e093345a171a8fa5bc957cc6c09" class="internal-link" title="nigeria">Nigeria</a> and <a href="resolveuid/865d3e2923aed79cec48d33f964868fd" class="internal-link" title="Brazil">Brazil</a> held workshops in late 2008, to help women in areas affected by plantations to share their experiences and find ways of working together to defend their communities and their land.<br /><br />In Papua New Guinea the focus was on oil palm plantations, which are being promoted mainly to supply the European market with palm oil (used in cosmetics, soap, vegetable oil and foodstuffs) and agrofuels. In Nigeria, the focus was on rubber plantations established on a community’s land by the French company Michelin, to produce rubber for car and bus tires. <br /><br />In Brazil, the case study looked at eucalyptus plantations set up by three companies – Stora Enso, Aracruz Celulose and Votorantim – to produce pulp for export to Europe for conversion into paper.<br /><br />Friends of the Earth International then worked with the World Rainforest Movement to develop case studies from the workshop findings, and publicize these internationally. Advocacy and campaigning tools developed using the case studies including a report, an audiovisual resource, short articles, declarations, and sign-on letters, among other outputs. <br /><br /></p>
<h4>what changed?</h4>
<p>The project has increased awareness about the differentiated gender impacts of plantations; and the role played by European actors promoting neoliberal economic policies that favor the expansion of their corporations in the South. This issue is now included in the campaigning agenda of a broad number of NGOs and social movements in the affected regions and in Europe, and has contributed to increased South-North and South-South collaboration around this particular issue.<br /><br />In Nigeria and Papua New Guinea, the workshops helped to empower women, who are shifting from being passive victims to actors capable of generating change. Participants were more able to identify the differentiated gender impacts of plantations and to share their findings with their communities. In both countries, women are play a bigger role in the struggle against plantations, while other groups within civil society are beginning to incorporate the gender dimension into their local and national campaigns against plantations.<br /><br />In Nigeria, women have publicly demonstrated against Michelin’s land usurpation, backed by an international petition with more than 2,000 signatures from a large number of countries in different regions, giving international visibility to the injustices they face. As a result Michelin has paid full compensation to one of the nine communities directly impacted. A second community was also approached but has rejected the compensation offered, because it is insufficient compared to the damage caused by the invasion of their territory and the destruction of their livelihoods. The women released a communiqué in which they exposed the role played by European governments and demanded the return of their lands and full compensation for the damage done.<br /><br />In Papua New Guinea, the workshop allowed women to learn from the experiences of women in other parts of the country already affected by palm oil plantations. They are now setting up the Women in Oil Palm Association, to facilitate women’s participation in decision-making processes. They have released a statement demanding a halt in the expansion of palm oil plantations, including a specific demand to the World Bank (the principal promoter of plantation expansion in Papua New Guinea) to shift its Smallholder Agriculture Development Projects facility, which provides credits to small rural producers, towards active promotion of crop diversification. These demands were reinforced by an international action that collected more than 8,700 signatures from individuals and organizations from different regions of the world.<br /><br />In southern Brazil, the resistance process against plantations is already organized and political demands well developed. Women are the main actors in struggles against plantations. The project helped reinforce this at the regional level and increased the visibility of women’s leadership role and of the transformation agenda, an inspiring example for women living in affected communities across the world. <br /><br />EU vice-president, Margot Wallström, has taken note of the problems documented by the project and has forwarded information to the EU agencies for Development Aid and External Relations. This will support campaigning around the EU’s energy targets, which involves palm oil plantations and second generation agrofuels.<br /><br />This project created a space to circulate information and tools around many key networks and information lists, and to share information with European civil society organizations from countries involved in the case studies.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><u>Find out more:</u></p>
<ul><li>
Read the report: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.wrm.org.uy/subjects/women/fullreport.pdf">www.wrm.org.uy/subjects/women/fullreport.pdf</a></li><li>
See the slideshow: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.wrm.org.uy/Videos/Women_Voices.html">www.wrm.org.uy/Videos/Women_Voices.html</a></li></ul>
<p><br /><strong><em>with thanks to our funder: the isvara foundation</em></strong><br /><br /></p>
<p class="caption">Photo credits: World Rainforest Movement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-13T11:05:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/agrofuels/against-certification-of-monocoltures">
    <title>Opposing the certification of palm oil, jatropha and sugar cane monocultures </title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/agrofuels/against-certification-of-monocoltures</link>
    <description>Our campaign to expose the role that agrofuels corporations have played in misleading the public was heard by the UK’s Advertising Standard Authority, who ruled that an advertisement placed by the Malaysian Palm Oil Council and aired on the BBC was misleading because it said that Malaysian palm oil is sustainable.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/12f95badf2040d553044a06cfbbded61" alt="Opposing the certification of palm oil, jatropha and sugar cane monocultures" width="300" />This victory helped us to stop corporations using false advertising and other public misinformation strategies to win over public opinion on agrofuels and undermine our efforts to strengthen existing rules. We produced further reports including: “<a href="resolveuid/3f8552ea912a0539edc5e8ddf0f5f4e4" class="internal-link" title="malaysian palm oil: green gold or green wash?">Malaysian Palm Oil – Green Gold or Green Wash?</a>”, “<a class="external-link" href="http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2008/sustainability_smokescreen_fullreport_med_res.pdf">Sustainability as a Smokescreen – The Inadequacy of Certifying Fuels and Feeds</a>" (in English and Spanish), and “<a href="resolveuid/265c75bbf16c13f272555b6f0ad7d736" class="internal-link" title="biofuels-fuelling-destruction-latinamerica">Fuelling Destruction in Latin America – The Real Price of the Drive for Agrofuels</a>” (in English and Spanish). These can be downloaded from our web site: <a href="resolveuid/0b6c4cb82f92179d4c35d2deff82f3d8" class="internal-link" title="english">www.foei.org</a>. FoEI also commissioned “Lost in Palm Oil”, a documentary that has been broadcast in TV stations in several European countries.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Additionally, we challenged false publicity about the potential of jatropha, and other plants that might be used for agrofuel production. In particular, FoE Africa groups and others set out to research the extent to which agrofuels are expanding <a href="resolveuid/6dae3d5bf26a2c781a8d711cb24212ee" class="internal-link" title="agrofuels in africa">across Africa</a>, through a literature review, on-the-ground observation, and interviews with government officials, community leaders, local authorities, farmers and farmers’ organizations, civil society groups and academics. The resulting report considers the state of agrofuels production in Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Cote D’Ivoire, Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Zambia and Zimbabwe. It records details, where available, on incoming investment, key companies, case studies, issues relating to land and legal rights, and environmental impact assessments. It also delves into government and state policies on agrofuels promotion and energy self-sufficiency.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Members of FoE Africa from Ghana, Mauritius, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Swaziland, Togo and Tunisia and met in July in Accra, Ghana, to review issues that confront the African environment. A particular focus was placed on the current food crisis and agrofuels production across the continent. The groups <a class="external-link" href="http://www.eraction.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=126:friends-of-the-earth-africa-statement&amp;catid=3">released a statement</a> expressing their disgust at the manner in which the burden for solutions to every crisis faced by the North is shifted onto Africa. Africa is forced to adapt to climate impacts, as well as having its land usurped to produce agrofuels to feed factories and machines in the North.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Through our <a href="resolveuid/09b7dea6f064848e53051f78f77fa0b4" class="internal-link" title="swaziland: poverty eradication through protecting biodiversity and food sovereignty">lobbying and campaigning work</a> in Swaziland and the UK, we succeeded in forcing D1 Oils Swaziland (a subsidiary of the UK-based D1 Oils company) to suspend any new planting of jatropha. This was achieved by putting pressure on Swaziland’s government to enact a policy mandating the Swaziland Environment Authority to order D1 Oils to stop all planting and conduct a Strategic Environmental Assessment. However, as a result of tensions around this controversial topic, many community activists subsequently faced violence and legal actions against them. The FoEI network was able to respond quickly through our cyber-action network, enabling thousands of people around the world to put pressure on the Swaziland government to take action to uphold and defend the human rights of people struggling to defend their livelihoods and communities.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The FoE Europe campaign on agrofuels was selected by the European Parliament Magazine as the most effective NGO campaign, specifically because of our high-visibility creative actions organized in collaboration with groups from all our regions. Improvements to our web site, and investments in communications in FoE Europe, allowed us to mobilize 47,000 people in May to participate in a poll by EC President Barroso, which changed the poll from 95% in favor of the EU's biofuels target to 89% against, in just three days.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>FoEI also organized two speakers’ tours (in May and December 2008) for leaders from the South, in order to raise awareness in Europe about the devastating impacts of growing crops to produce agrofuels. We also organized an action in front of the Brazilian embassy in Brussels to protest against their agrofuels policies, in collaboration with La Via Campesina and FIAN (Face It Act Now – for the right to food). The speakers took part in lobby meetings to demand an end to the EU 10% biofuels target, with Members of the European Parliament and representatives of the European Commission. Similar meetings were organized with national parliaments in France, Hungary, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK. The visiting speakers also lectured at universities in Brussels, Grenoble, Leuven, Montpellier, and the UNDP University in Namur. They received good media coverage, including through outlets such as Télé Grenoble, Midi Libre, France 3 TV, Planète Libre Magazine, national TV RFO, Radio Campus in Belgium, Panoramica magazine, ANP Netherlands, Agrarisch Dagblad, and Agripress Belgium.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
FoE Brazil and FoEI also successful <a href="resolveuid/8117e32af8470f998138e4e1c32fca20" class="internal-link" title="brazil: demystifying the ‘sustainability’ of ethanol">countered the general acceptance of sugar cane ethanol</a>, which is promoted heavily by the Brazilian government and industry in the North as a ‘sustainable source of energy’ and ‘part of the solution to climate change’. We contributed to the international campaign through a series of publications and campaign materials, participation in public events, and the organization of counter activities at the international conference on agrofuels held in Brazil in November 2008 (much to the apparent annoyance of the agrofuels sector represented by UNICA).
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>When the Round Table for Responsible Soy (RTRS) met in Buenos Aires, FoEI helped&nbsp; gathering civil society from producer countries (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) as well as importing countries in the EU, to protest against the use of ‘sustainable soy’ certification schemes, which are bound to fail because they do not address the overall expansion of monoculture plantations to produce increasing quantities of agrofuels. Similar round-table approaches around the world have completely failed to address the major social and environmental impacts of industrial-scale soy cultivation and actually serve to frustrate real solutions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Whilst the RTRS met, we released the publication '<a class="external-link" href="http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2008/sustainability_smokescreen_fullreport_med_res.pdf">Sustainability as a Smokescreen</a>', which looks into all the major certification schemes being introduced in relation to soy and sugar cane production in Latin America. Our lobbying work has strengthened the positions of several producer countries, particularly Argentina: some of them are now taking a more critical look at the environmental impacts of monoculture plantations. &nbsp;
<p>&nbsp;</p>
We continued to support communities in the South that are directly resisting the appropriation of their territories for agrofuels production. This included engaging in direct actions alongside communities (for example, in <a class="external-link" href="http://www.agrocombustiblescolombia.org">Colombia</a>), and mobilizing international support through solidarity and letter-writing actions in support of activists and communities facing repression because of their defense of their territories. Other international opportunities included the selection of Meena Raman, FoEI's chair in 2008, as the NGO representative to speak at the High Level Segment of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Conference of Parties in Bonn. She emphasized the dangers of agrofuels, and the threats of so-called sustainable biofuels and the certification of agricultural production for agrofuels purposes. The CBD concluded that although positive use of ‘biofuels’ should be promoted, the negative impacts should be identified and minimized, paying attention to the rights of indigenous peoples and threats to biodiversity conservation.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="caption">Photo credits: FoE Brazil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-08T17:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/agrofuels">
    <title>Agrofuels campaign highlights</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/annual-report-2009/what-we-achieved-in-2009/program-highlights/agrofuels</link>
    <description>The campaign’s main objective is to stop the production, trade and consumption of agrofuels, by raising public awareness about its negative impacts on local communities and globally.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/74a65ddc2cebc0b22d112db31de141d7/image_preview" alt="David Gilbert, USA - 2nd place" />
<p>In 2009, the campaign focused on strengthening local communities’ defence of their territories, and exposing ‘false solutions’ to the climate and energy crisis. A prerequisite for this was compiling research, reports, and national and regional positions from the federation’s members, as agrofuels is a relatively new issue and data is sparse.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Nevertheless, there have already been some excellent external achievements by this relatively young campaign, in part because of its links to FoEI’s ongoing campaign against the deforestation caused by oil palm plantations.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>2009 was particularly notable because of the World Bank’s suspension of its investments in oil palm plantation companies. In September 2009, the International Finance Corporation (the IFC, the World&nbsp;Bank's private sector arm) announced that it would halt all palm oil investments until a revised strategy for financing the sector was in place. The World&nbsp;Bank&nbsp;Group statement was unveiled on 9 September in a letter from its president Robert Zoellick, who was responding to an appeal from Indonesian and international NGOs. A coalition of local and international NGOs, spearheaded by the UK organization Forest Peoples Program and including FoE Netherlands, had previously filed a complaint with the IFC's internal watchdog, the Compliance Advisory Ombudsman office (CAO) about a series of loans to palm oil giant&nbsp;Wilmar International. A joint report by three NGOs (FoE Netherlands, Kontak Rakyat Borneo and Gemawan), had examined&nbsp;Wilmar's plantations in Sambas, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, and found that the company was working with dubious licenses, and was entangled in land rights conflicts and illegal logging activities. This complaint triggered an audit by the CAO, which concluded that the IFC had violated its own procedures, and that commercial interests had overruled the IFC's environmental and social standards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Indonesian President has also identified illegal logging as another form of entrenched corruption, saying that he appreciated the efforts of Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth which have been active in criticising the forest management of his government, saying, "I want to give my appreciation for their concerns and hope they will continue their partnership with Indonesia."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Friends of the Earth groups from Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea also joined forces to develop and propose a mandatory code of conduct for Malaysian palm oil companies operating in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. An intense advocacy campaign was directed at the Malaysian opposition group in Parliament; the Malaysian Palm Oil Association, Board, and Council; and the Human Rights Council. The groups also tried to lobby the Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities, and the Prime Minister. The three groups, together with Sawit Watch, testified to the failure of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) process, and requested the introduction of the proposed legally binding code of conduct. They have so far received positive responses from the Human Rights Council and the Opposition Party, who have accepted that Malaysian palm oil expansion has created adverse impacts, including haze from forest and land fires during land clearing, social conflicts with local communities, and environmental impacts.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Friends of the Earth also filed a complaint with the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) against the Malaysian Palm Oil Council for falsely advertising that palm oil is the "only product able to sustainably and efficiently meet a larger portion of the world's increasing demand for oil crop-based consumer goods, foodstuffs and biofuels." The ASA ruled that this statement was misleading, and that the Malaysian Palm Oil Council’s claim that palm oil contributes to alleviation of poverty was also misleading. The ASA found there was “not a consensus of the economic impact of palm oil on local communities” and stated that the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil certification scheme was “still the subject of debate”; and that making a claim that palm oil could be wholly sustainable, which cannot be substantiated, was deemed to be misleading. In November 2009, we followed up on this ruling by filing a grievance with the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) against the Malaysian Palm Oil Council, for violating the members' Code of Conduct and continuing to mislead the public and make unsubstantiated claims about the production, procurement and use of palm oil.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>FoE Indonesia has played an important role in these campaign actions, and regional coordination of oil palm activities in the Asia Pacific. The group also facilitated communications, and coordinated capacity-building on agrofuels, land rights and monocultures issues, including with communities in remote areas such as Kupang in Indonesia (2,000 miles from Jakarta).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>FoEI is committed to strengthening local communities’ capacity to defend their territories. We have worked with and supported communities that are keen to find out more about isolating and analyzing some of the ‘false solutions’ to the climate change and energy crises commonly proposed. A process of capacity-building on agrofuels, land rights and monoculture has also been initiated in Central America. We have also helped to coordinate different groups and communities wanting to work together on agrofuels. In Latin America, for example, this has involved bringing together the food sovereignty network in Guatemala, the food sovereignty and agrarian reform network of Honduras, the Water Valley communities in Honduras, victims of kidney failure due to sugar cane plantations in Nicaragua, and Via Campesina and World March of Women groups in El Salvador, amongst others. A video on "Monocultures, Land and Agrofuels in Central America" was created by FoE El Salvador with these communities’ support.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>FoEI also organized an international delegation to gather evidence on the impact of agrofuels in Colombia, 1-10 July, with 40 international participants. Several members of FoEI took part: FoE Indonesia, FoE Uruguay, FoE Paraguay and FoE Brazil. The main objective of this delegation was to gather empirical evidence about the environmental impacts of agribusinesses producing biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel). This involved identifying and documenting human rights, economic, social and cultural rights violations, as well as violations of ethnic and environmental rights, and infringements on the food sovereignty of afro-Colombian, peasant and Indigenous communities in the country.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Lobbying efforts in Europe remain focused on challenging the EU’s target of 10% of all road transport fuel coming from ‘renewable’ sources by 2020, with a majority likely to come from agrofuels. Key to this is increasing Europeans’ awareness of the impacts of agrofuels and about potential alternatives. This included the publication of "Biofuels: handle with care," an analysis of EU biofuels policy with recommendations for action, in November 2009. This document contains a clear set of policy recommendations focusing variously on European policy, European member states, and investors and industry.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Advocacy by FoE Netherlands and allied Dutch NGOs has also led to some important national developments that are influencing the course of EU debates relating to agrofuels. Palm oil remains excluded from the Dutch subsidy ruling for green electricity for 2010, despite RSPO certified palm oil becoming available. However, palm oil is however still part of the agrofuel mix in the Netherlands, and the hard won&nbsp;promise from Dutch Minister Cramer that sustainability concerns would take priority cannot be fulfilled because it is over-ruled by the weaker EU Renewable Energy Directive. However, the Dutch position in Brussels includes having at least some sustainability criteria for solid biomass in the Renewable Energy Directive, and promoting the use of an indirect land use change factor for calculating emissions for agrofuels. This resulted in the postponement of an EC decision, planned for 2009, that was supposed to state that solid biomass would not be subject to sustainability criteria.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>FoE Netherlands also commissioned a publication on alternative implementation of the EU Renewables Directive for Transport in the Netherlands, "New Roads for Transport - Towards a sustainable solution for the 10% renewable transport energy target in 2020." This report on agrofuels alternatives also found its way to Brussels and the UK, and has been quoted frequently by industry players from the electric car and food industries.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In April 2009, FoE US and Earthtrack published a report "A Boon for Bad Biofuels: federal tax credits and mandates underwrite environmental damage at taxpayer expense," which focuses on US subsidies to the biofuels industry.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In September, comments were also submitted by the environmental community in the US, including FoE US, on the US Environmental Protection Agency’s draft regulation on the United States Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The RFS, in the&nbsp;Energy&nbsp;Independence Security Act of 2007, mandates a massive fivefold&nbsp;increase in agrofuels use and is a major driver of agrofuels production in the&nbsp;United States&nbsp;and abroad.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>FoEI also facilitated research into agrofuels in many parts of the world, including on:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">the increase in agrofuel plantations in Central America and the link with the free trade agreement between the US and Central America;&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">the financing policies of the Inter-American Development Bank and how they are exacerbating climate change by promoting dirty energy and the promotion of agrofuels in Latin America;&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">the size and scope of subsidies for agrofuels in the US;&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">jatropha production in Swaziland;&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">land grabbing in Africa; and&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">agrofuels production in Mozambique.&nbsp;</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This research has also been used to develop position papers on the activities of the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), the Roundtable on Responsible Soy (RTRS), and the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels. It also laid the foundations for the proposed mandatory code of conduct for palm oil companies in Malaysia. FoE has also conducted research into the position of Dutch banks financing agrofuel plantations, and how much money oil companies receive for using agrofuels.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Friends of the Earth’s aim of reaching a broader public was also substantially achieved through the broadcasting of footage from our commissioned film, "Lost in Palm Oil," which was broadcast on ARTE channel (30 million audience); on Dutch public broadcaster VARA; on Spanish national television (TVE); and on NDR&nbsp; (Germany).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In keeping with FoEI’s commitment to awareness raising and mobilization we also:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Participated in a tour to raise awareness about the threats posed by biofuels in Costa Rica and other Central American countries.</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Held a forum in El Salvador on the international day against plantations, denouncing regional plans to promote monocultures of sugar cane, palm and jatropha for agrofuels.</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Participated in public activities such as ‘Biofools Day’ activities, on 1 April. Over 10,000 activists participated, selecting Hugh Grant of Monsanto as 2009’s biggest&nbsp;Biofool.</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Held an agrofuels awareness raising event in Tokyo, which was hosted by FoE Japan and its allies.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Created or participated in many other ‘solidarity spaces’ including an international forum on agrofuels in Sao Paolo, Brazil; an international forum on agrofuels in Paraguay; the dialogue of the Americas on agribusiness and agrofuels, "Building Alternatives from the food and energy sovereignty perspectives"; and the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) forum in Nigeria.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The EJRN Program has also collaborated with the Agrofuels Campaign to organize a set of concrete activities including a publication on the role of private banks and their funding to promote agrofuels, a photo exhibition and activities on plantations and agrofuels at the European Social Forum.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Stop Agrofuels Campaign working areas are:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Defence of land</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Building a movement against agribusiness</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">Certification mechanisms</span></li><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">EU and US goals for agrofuels</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Cross-cutting areas include:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">With the EJRN Program - a focus on exposing and countering the role of corporations, trade and investments in the agrofuels sector.</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul><li><span style="line-height: 18px;" class="Apple-style-span">With the Food Sovereignty Program - on Plantations.</span></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Coordinators&nbsp;and participants</h3>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">Co-Coordinators:</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">Silvia Quiroa, FoEI El Salvador, yada@navegante.com.sv</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">Torry Kuswardono, FoE Indonesia, torry@foei.org</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">The Stop Agrofuels Steering Group includes:</p>
<ul><li>For Africa: Thuli Makama, FoE Swaziland</li><li>For North America: Kate Horner, FoE US</li><li>For Latin America: Elias Diaz, FoE Paraguay, and FoE Brazil</li><li>For Asia Pacific: Damien Ase, FoE Papua New Guinea</li><li>For Europe: Adrian Bebb, FoE Europe</li></ul>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">Groups that have actively participated in the Stop Agrofuels Campaign in 2009 include: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, El Salvador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay and Uruguay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-08T17:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/agrofuels/agrofuels">
    <title>Agrofuels campaign highlights in 2008</title>
    <link>http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/annual-report/2008/what-we-achieved-in-2008/program-highlights/agrofuels/agrofuels</link>
    <description>The main goal of FoEI's agrofuels campaign is to halt the development, production and trade of agrofuels, which is threatening food sovereignty and biodiversity, and has been shown to be a false solution to the climate crisis.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<img class="image-right" src="resolveuid/7e5cc6214ac1d0476fa71d451da3e52b" alt="foei's agrofuel campaign highlights in 2008" />
<p>During the past two years, agrofuels have been a top advocacy priority for the federation, cutting across almost all of our program areas. During this period, more than 35 FoEI groups in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Cameroon, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Denmark, El Salvador, England Wales &amp; N Ireland, France, Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Malta, Mozambique, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Scotland, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Spain, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Togo, Uganda, Uruguay and US, worked in solidarity to achieve this goal.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>accomplishments</h3>
FoEI launched its international <a href="resolveuid/0ed98f02d22415e1fe738e5d54f9c188" class="internal-link" title="agrofuels">Agrofuels campaign</a> in 2008, raising the profile of local and national struggles to stop the expansion of <a href="resolveuid/117afc5d32a561f1bbe56ce1e7bc8994" class="internal-link" title="against certification of monocoltures">monoculture plantations for agrofuel production</a>. During 2008, FoEI was able to expose the <a href="resolveuid/2f57814c45e4548aa2f8d3a88f8a0146" class="internal-link" title="fighted financial support to agrofuels">factors and institutions that are driving destructive agrofuels production</a>, and link affected communities facing similar problems around the world, strengthening their capacity to promote national and international policies that support their rights to sustainable livelihoods.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We received a lot of press attention and succeeded in helping to shift public opinion on agrofuels, not just in Europe but throughout producer countries. The fact that increasing attention has been paid to food production, because of the global food crisis, meant that we were presented with an important opportunity to raise concerns about competition between crops for food and crops for fuel (although we approached this issue cautiously as we believe that the food crisis is driven by many significant factors, including speculation in agricultural commodities, and false solutions such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and increased dependence on artificial inputs to agriculture).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Our various activities also reinforced national and regional alliances with social movements fighting for food sovereignty and resisting large scale monocultures, raised FoEI’s profile in debates about energy and climate justice, and contributed to the implementation of FoEI’s Agrofuels campaign internationally.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>UrskaMerc</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-08T17:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>





</rdf:RDF>
