|
|
- Info
page 27
|
issue
100
|
first quarter
2002
|
|
other people's
money
the third global ministerial
environment forum
simone lovera, foei
“There ain't no better money than other
people's money.” This old saying dominated
the discussions at the Global Ministerial
Environment Forum (GMEF) from 12-15
February in Cartagena, Colombia, where the
ultimate question was: who will pay for
UNEP's badly needed budget increase?
After all, none of the 90 ministers who
attended could openly deny that both the
staggering lack of funding and the
instability of UNEP's income are behind its
ineffectiveness as a "global environmental
authority". The entire budget of the UN
Environment Programme is less than US$100
million, making it one of the smallest
bodies in the United Nations system. Funds
and authority are intricately linked; any
UN body has more influence if it arrives to
solve a problem carrying a nice bag of
money.
Yet despite this acknowledgement, and no
less than four ministerial meetings in one
year, the final ministers' decision
provides the basis for neither stable,
predictable, nor adequate UNEP funding.
Instead, in an almost laughable compromise
solution, countries are encouraged to
contribute on the basis of a voluntary,
indicative scale they may adapt to their
own financial situation, or "any other
basis" that might be identified!
unep strengthening denied
Other careful references to
developments that might strengthen
environmental governance, such as UNEP's
possible reform into a specialized agency,
were ruthlessly shot down by ministers. The
US was particularly averse, proving once
again this country's disinterest in the
environmental pillar of sustainable
development. UNEP is now permitted to
"encourage" cooperation between
multilateral environmental agreements that
happen to deal with the same issue -- not
exactly the hoped-for breakthrough on
increased coherence between existing
agreements.
compliance & enforcement
The European Union pushed for more
coherent compliance mechanisms, a key FoEI
proposal from our discussions on
international environmental governance, but
the US and others blocked this attempt.
On a more positive note, the ministers
adopted the guidelines on compliance and
enforcement prepared by UNEP. Regretfully,
Australia and the US blocked proposals for
the regular monitoring of compliance with
sustainable development agreements. But
there was an agreement that the guidelines
would form the basis for further capacity
building in the area of compliance and
enforcement, leaving the door open for
future work on their implementation.
good news
The ministers also endorsed the Bahia
Declaration of the Intergovernmental Forum
on Chemical Safety as a basis for a
strategic approach to chemicals management,
and committed themselves to further support
for the Global Plan of Action on Land-based
Sources of Marine Pollution.
And the good news for civil society
organizations is that the ministers
supported more effective approaches to
ensure these organizations' views are
incorporated in future GMEF's, including
the convening of informal civil society
meetings prior to these intergovernmental
meetings. However, it was decided that the
revision of formal participation rules
would be taken up only after 2003.
Unfortunately, an EU attempt to highlight
public participation and access to
information through Principle 10 of the Rio
Declaration and the Aarhus Convention was
blocked by the US, Egypt, Canada, China and
Indonesia.
hungry unep courts industry
Meanwhile, the close relationship
between UNEP and one particular sector of
civil society -- business and industry --
provides a reason for increasing concern.
Now that stable public funding for and
formal strengthening of UNEP seem to be off
the agenda for a while, the executive
director and key bureau members of UNEP's
governing council are turning to business
for financial assistance. A plan of action
on the road to Johannesburg could include
narrow cooperation between UNEP and
industrial sectors like tourism, oil
producers and insurance companies.
It is just a matter of time before we will
see "public-private partnerships" in the
form of Shell-sponsored UNEP projects for
cleaner oil production in tropical forests,
or coral reefs sponsored by tourism
agencies. After all, other people's money
doesn't smell!
|
|
|
|