|
issue
101
|
second quarter
2002
|
|
a vision for resistance
international mining activists create
unified agenda
Gabriel Rivas-Ducca,
FoE Costa
Rica, FoEI Mining Campaign Coordinator
With economic globalization, the mining
industry has consolidated its operations
and its agenda. If mining activists are to
deal with this increasingly unified threat,
we must have a cohesive vision and agenda
of our own.
defining our vision
We can look through the mining
industry's cosmetic exercise of the
Minerals, Mining and Sustainable
Development project (see article page 7)
and see that its agenda is to run business
as usual, regardless of environmental and
social harms. Knowing this we must ask:
“What is the shared vision of mining
activists around the world, including local
communities that suffer the impacts?”
Defining this shared vision was the
central objective of a recent international
meeting. More than sixty NGOs, activists
and community leaders assembled at the
“Building a Global Mining Campaign”
conference from November 28 - December 2,
2001 in Warrenton, Virginia, USA. Organized
by the Mineral Policy Center of the USA
with the support of the Ford Foundation,
the meeting featured strong Friends of the
Earth participation.
key issues
Foremost among the key issues and
trends that emerged was the lack of
community consultation and consent for
mining projects, and the lack of benefits
communities accrue from mining projects.
Abuse of human and environmental rights,
including water and air pollution, were
also recognized as key problems, as was the
lack of government regulation of mines.
This is only a short list of the social,
economic, cultural and environmental
problems described at the conference, many
more of which are elaborated elsewhere in
this issue.
industry more influential,
organized
The mining industry is consolidating
as trade globalizes and liberalizes, and
the number of southern multinationals is
growing. The industry's overall influence
is also on the rise: it is more organized
in its use of public relations, and it has
recently made industry-wide efforts to
consolidate its position, especially on
environmental and social issues.
Mining projects are also increasing in
scale and severity of impact, and tend to
use more chemicals, such as cyanide, in
their processes. Simultaneously, there is
decreasing demand for labour, and the price
of metals is falling. There is also an
increasing trend towards militarization in
mining regions.
positive trends
On the positive side, recognition of
indigenous rights is growing. The
relationships between NGOs and local
communities are being strengthened and
increasing in importance as they expand
their organizational capacities. There is
also a willingness of public and private
institutions to look at corporate
responsibility.
identifying our vision
After identifying the problems and
trends mentioned above, the participants
imagined how mining should look ten to
twenty years from now. What type of change
could be achieved through a common campaign
effort? Below is a summary of the agreed
upon points:
-
Internationally accepted community
rights to self-determination and to say
“no” to mines; prior informed consent
-
Rights of communities to pursue
“alternative” economic development
-
Mining that benefits communities
economically
-
Less reliance on mining
(extraction)
-
An end to uranium and gold mining
-
A ban on the use of cyanide in gold
processing
-
A ban on riverine and submarine
tailings disposal
-
A campaign for the better use of
metals (more recycling, less demand, more
re-use, more renewables)
-
The establishment of mining as a
privilege, not a right
-
Stronger regulation and control at
all levels
-
The requirement that mining companies
internalize all social, cultural, and
environmental costs
-
A closed-loop consumption system and
shift to renewable resources
-
No mining in protected areas or
important ecological, agricultural, and
economic zones
-
Better land-use planning,
prioritization and protection
-
International law that meets the
world's best standards; globalization of
best practices; putting enforceable
international legal mechanisms in
place
-
Socially and environmentally
responsible mining investment and no
mining industry financing with public
money
-
Wealth measured in human values
rather than materials
-
Mining companies becoming accountable
for social, environmental and financial
impacts
-
Remediation of existing abandoned
mines
-
A strong active global anti-mining
network with integration between NGOs and
communities
corporate dystopia vs. citizen's
agenda
Another important topic addressed at
the conference was how we, as mining
activists, respond to the WTO's Doha
Agenda.
According to Victor Menotti of the
International Forum on Globalization,
“Global civil society's response to the
Doha agenda has already been launched:
grassroots organizations around the world
will be using the UN World Summit on
Sustainable Development to beat back the
Doha agenda. The Johannesburg's "peoples'
process" will be just one of a number of
convergences required to replace the WTO's
bid for a corporate dystopia with an
international citizen's agenda that
protects the poor and the planet”.
Indeed, the peoples' process to protect
the poor and the planet from the mining
industry's greed is well underway, and it
is heartily welcomed by FoEI's Mining
Campaign.
|
|
|