|
issue
101
|
second quarter
2002
|
|
the sad lesson of the doñana
disaster
toxic mining spill damages world-famous
nature area
josé antonio pascual trillo,
foe
spain
Early on the morning of 25 April 1998, a
dam containing stagnant, toxic waste water
from the Aznacóllar Mine burst. Five
million cubic metres of heavy-metal laden
water broke free and flowed into the
Guadiamar river, directly polluting more
than 4,400 hectares of land and wiping out
almost all life in the river.
The Aznacóllar disaster is a cautionary
tale of what can go wrong with mines even
in well-developed countries with strong
regulations. The lead-zinc mine, located
near Seville in the southern Spanish
province of Andalucía, was owned by the
Swedish-Canadian transnational
Boliden-Apirsa.
warnings not heeded
In 1995, accusations from two mine
workers alerted authorities to the dam's
condition and the possibility of
contamination of the Guadiamar river.
Boliden responded that the dam wall was
entirely safe. Just over two years later,
the dam collapsed.
attempts to contain toxic flow
Anxiety over the severely toxic
overflow was compounded by its proximity to
Doñana National Park, a UN World Heritage
Area and home to six million migratory
birds as well as the habitat for rare
species such as lynx, otters and imperial
eagles.
Aided by neighbouring landowners who were
also affected, government authorities
strengthened river banks and built
protective dykes to stop contaminated
waters from invading the park. But despite
their attempts to rebuild the mine's broken
dam, contaminated waters continued to flow
over its walls. Fortunately, the most
valuable wetland areas were not polluted.
Nonetheless, a huge area of land was
contaminated, endangering humans and
wildlife alike. Over the next few years,
work to eliminate the toxic sediments from
this land will continue.
scientific follow-up
Teams were formed to supervise
follow-up and recovery efforts, led by a
group of experts designated by Spain's
Higher Council of Scientific Investigation.
Their studies indicate that the severe
metal and arsenic contamination of the
Guadiamar river's mud and sediments has
diminished. The river's fish are only just
recovering. Metal concentrations in aquatic
organisms, although lower than before,
remain above normal. Certain invertebrate
species selected as indicator species still
show severe concentrations of heavy metals
and a high degree of toxicity.
There are also significant concentrations
of metals in surrounding trees. Yet
Doñana's bird colonies have been less
affected than first feared, thanks to some
accidental factors, such there being lower
numbers present at the park during the
winter of 1999/2000. Still, there is
uncertainty over the scope of ecological
damage.
profits privatized, losses
socialized
The Aznacóllar disaster illustrates
the inherent risks of mining, the threats
posed to the environment, and the control
--or lack thereof -- we have over mining
companies. Because the village of
Aznacóllar was economically dependent on
the mine, Boliden was given exceptional
subsidies for cleaning up, controlling the
overflow, and keeping their activities
running. After their surprising acquittal
in a highly-criticized court case over
their role in the disaster, Boliden closed
the mine without accepting any
responsibility or paying any of the costs
of the accident.
The high costs of the disaster's
mitigation have been almost entirely
covered by public institutions, and paid
for by the entire population through taxes.
The same will go for the social costs
generated by the mine's closure and
subsequent economic collapse of the region,
and for compensation to local fishers,
farmers and cattle ranchers who lost income
due to the disaster.
The judicial and political systems'
incapacity to hold Boliden responsible says
much about our society's inability to deal
with and prevent such risks. It also
questions the wisdom of socio-economic
dependency of entire populations on mining
ventures with high environmental risks.
What is clear is that the well-known and
highly perverse strategy of privatized
profits and socialized losses continues to
apply. This is a pitiful environmental
strategy.
Finally, when one realizes that a disaster
like that in Aznacóllar can take place with
total impunity in a European Union country,
it isn't hard to imagine the real impacts –
both reported and unreported – that result
from mining activities in less wealthy
countries. Fewer regulations and a high
political and economic dependency on
foreign firms and investment capital make
poorer nations less able to prevent, or
deal with the aftermath, of toxic disasters
like that of Aznacóllar.
|
|
|