Personal tools
  • mobilize, resist, transform
You are here: Home english publications link issue 93 e93gmodanger
 

voices icon

 

e93gmodanger

  issue 93 link
april/june 2000   

 

GMO DANGERS SUBSTANTIATED

GMO proponents’ cavalier attitude toward safety has caused great concern among environmental groups and the general public. Now the respected US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has substantiated this concern. Their April 2000 report on biotech foods proposes safety testing to address GMO risks that range from new allergens to lost nutritional value. Health, the environment and agriculture could all face risks from GMOs, according to the report.

Health Concerns
GMO foods may introduce new allergens into foods, according to the NAS. People with allergies might unwittingly expose themselves to allergens when they eat foods that contain new or foreign proteins introduced by genetic engineering. A second human health concern is toxicity. GM foods might contain completely new toxins, or higher levels of existing toxins. Genetic modifications may also move toxins to new locations, for example into the part of a plant that is eaten.

Genetic manipulation makes the presence of allergens and toxins very hard to predict due to an effect called pleiotropy, which refers to a multiple effect arising from single genes. For example, a new gene that causes a tomato to ripen early may also produce an allergen that never existed before. There is currently no adequate way to test for these "difficult to predict" but serious, even life-threatening effects, the NAS states, emphasizing that new tests are needed.

Still another GMO health concern is less deadly, but of broad concern: genetic modifications might reduce foods' nutritional content, the NAS warns.

Environment and Agriculture
GMOs also have serious implications for the health of the environment and agriculture. Some GM crops contain genes that code for pesticides. However, these toxins might kill organisms beside the target pest. "Nontarget effects are often unknown or difficult to predict," states the NAS. The target pests' own predators or parasites could be killed, and the loss of these natural enemies could cause the original pest to proliferate. Other kinds of beneficial insects might also be wiped out.

In addition to engineered pesticides, new and unpredictable compounds in GM plants could also have serious implications for biodiversity and food chains. Insects and other animals may be adversely affected. Predicting the effect of new gene products on thousands of different animal species is an impossible task.

Soil and the organisms it harbours are also at risk, says the NAS. New compounds in GM plants could alter the chemistry of soils when their leaves or other plant parts fall onto the earth and decay. This might even make the soil harmful to organisms living in it.

Another alarming and unavoidable outcome of GM crops is gene flow. " Total containment of crop genes is not considered to be feasible when seeds are distributed and grown on a commercial scale," states the NAS. This means that genes from GM crops will escape and enter wild species, possibly harming human health and the environment.

The language of the NAS may be reserved, for example referring to risks as "uncertainties" and the lack of vital research as "minimal data sets", but the report drives home the same points that have caused so much public concern. GM products are unpredictable, largely untested or un-testable, and impossible to contain.

Janice Wormworth , FoEI

Source: Rachel's Environment & Health Weekly, #696, 11 May 2000.

Subscriptions to Rachels' available from listserv@lists.rachel.org with the words SUBSCRIBE RACHEL-WEEKLY YOUR NAME in the message

top table of contents


Document Actions