Personal tools
  • mobilize, resist, transform
You are here: Home english publications link issue 93 e93indianfarmers
 

voices icon

 

e93indianfarmers

  issue 93 link
april/june 2001   

 

INDIAN FARMERS UPROOT AND DROWN ILLEGAL GM CROPS


Just minutes after Monsanto's Kinyua Mbiajewe portrayed GMOs as greatly beneficial for poor farmers in Kenya at FoE Europe's "Sustainable Agriculture in the New Millennium" conference, M.D. Nanjundaswamy of Via Campesina described a vastly different scenario. Nanjundaswamy, a member of this ten-million strong international farmers alliance, explained how GM crops were the target of two separate Via Campesina actions in his native India. "Both cases were totally illegal," said Nanjundaswamy.

In the first case, a field trial of Bt cotton was illegally planted earlier than permitted under the Indian government regulations governing GM field trials. The company violated a second Indian regulation by failing to notify the Agriculture Department of the field trials. More surprising still, the farmer on whose land the cotton was planted was also completely unaware that the crop was a transgenic test trial.

"We went to the village where the field trial was, and we talked to the farmer and had a village meeting. We explained the implications of cultivating this crop," said Nanjundaswamy, who lives in the state of Karnataka where this violation occurred. "No biosafety measures were taken in the field, and there was a risk of all possible dangers arising out of such a trial," he continued. "The farmer immediately understood the implications, and he and the village agreed to pull out the plants." Nanjundaswamy's organization has since forced the Indian government to make public a list of all 40 field trials being conducted in India.

The second case was a disaster for thousands of farmers. Monsanto's transgenic C7 sorghum, as yet not certified by the Indian government, was nonetheless sold to 3000 farmers who cultivated the crop over an area of 30,000 acres. "The crop failed one hundred percent," said Nanjundaswamy. "There were earheads coming out, but no grain at all, with the result that we have sued Monsanto in the consumer tribunals."

Nanjundaswamy, who is a lawyer and a farmer, is certain that Monsanto will have to pay damages. "They were trying to soften farmers by offering 3000 rupees ex gratia - out of generosity - not even US$70 per acre. We said, "No, nothing doing, we want damages." They will pay soon." Nanjundaswamy said his organization then got a first court order to have the 18 remaining tonnes of seeds seized by the courts, and a second court order later to destroy the seed. "We wanted to burn it, but Monsanto through the local seed company told us to give it a watery grave. So we dug a big pit, threw the sorghum into it, poured water in, then covered it with mud. And so we gave it a watery grave."

Janice Wormworth, FoEI

 

top table of contents


Document Actions