Personal tools
  • mobilize, resist, transform
You are here: Home english publications link issue 96 e96chadcampipe
 

voices icon

 

e96chadcampipe

  issue 96 link
january/march 2001   

 

CHAD-CAMEROON OIL PIPELINE
Everything Under Control?
The controversial Chad-Cameroon pipeline, approved by the World Bank in June 2000 and currently being constructed by a consortium of oil companies including Chevron, Petronas and Exxon-Mobil, is off to a rocky start.

The pipeline, long opposed by Friends of the Earth and other local and international NGOs, will stretch 1,050 kilometres through Chad to the Cameroonian port of Kribi. It will cut through rainforest, Pygmy territories and major food and cotton producing areas. Resulting spills could have an enormous impact on the livelihoods of local people, and it is estimated that thousands of fishermen will be put out of work.

Dollars for Arms
Late last year, Chadian President Idriss Deby revealed that he had used US$4.5 million of the funds designated for the pipeline to buy weapons. This news sent a jolt through the Bank. Because of the well-known corruption in the Chadian government, the Bank had imposed strict accounting standards for the pipeline loan, insisting on guarantees from the Chadian government to ensure that its oil profits-- predicted to total as much as $100 million a year -- would be used to improve public health, education and vital infrastructure.

This "Chadian model" would prove that the Bank could overcome this African nation's endemic corruption and that the same approach might be applied to other corruption-prone oil-producing lands. Robert Calderisi, the World Bank director for Chad and several other central African countries, said he was "sobered and disappointed" by Deby's action, which he called an "object lesson on the need for more transparency". In response, the World Bank and the IMF temporarily froze their debt reconstruction programme for the country.

In response to this scandal, FoEI and other NGOs wrote to the European Investment Bank, which approved a $160 million loan for the oil project last year. "The arms purchases show that the World Bank - and thus also the EIB - are not capable of preventing such abuses," said FoE Europe's Magda Stoczkiewicz.

Compensation Blues
Compensation payments for people affected by the pipeline project went into effect at the beginning of 2001. In spite of the fact that the amounts received were modest compared to the real needs of the population, Bantu villagers were satisfied with their compensations. The Pygmee population, on the other hand, has not yet been compensated for the impact the pipeline will have on their land and the forests upon which they depend for their daily survival. In fact, it was only under pressure from the World Bank that the pipeline consortium hastily put together an IPP (Indigenous Peoples' Plan), which nevertheless does not come close to meeting the requirements set out in the World Bank Directive on Indigenous Peoples. The Pygmees wonder whether the IPP will turn out to be nothing but a smokescreen to foster public support for the oil project.

Striking Workers
A strike by the employees of one of the consortium's sub-contractors in early February illustrates that both national laws and the commitments made prior to the World Bank's approval of the pipeline in June 2000 are being violated. It appears that all important positions are occupied by ex-patriots, and that Cameroonian workers have neither pay slips nor working contracts. Only a few months after the inauguration of the project, the oil consortium and its associates have quickly forgotten their promises about job-creation and their contribution to the fight against poverty in Chad and Cameroon.

According to one striking worker, "The payment they give us is miserable. We don't get any premiums, and the methods used to calculate the salaries are incomprehensible." Another added: "Oil industry people are piling up money to save in the North, and putting the Cameroonians they hire under a modern form of slavery."

Silenced Press
Furthermore, according to FoE Cameroon, Exxon-Mobil has forbidden local authorities along the pipeline route, employees of the pipeline consortium, and even the consortium director to give interviews to the press without the explicit authorization of the oil company.

Information from FoE Cameroon, FoE Europe and FoEI's December Bulletin on What's Up in the International Financial Institutions programme (B-IFI).

top table of contents


Document Actions