|
|
- Info
e9719
|
issue
97
|
april/june 2001
|
|
TRADING AWAY HUMAN
AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS
Free Trade Area of the Americas
Launched
In April, 34 heads of state and trade
ministers from every nation in the western
hemisphere except Cuba discussed a proposal
under development by the United States
since 1994. The proposed Free Trade Area of
the Americas (FTAA), which will be open for
signature in 2005, combines aspects of
NAFTA (the North American Free Trade
Agreement), elements of some of the WTO
commitments, and parts of the failed
Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI).
The FTAA will effectively handcuff
governments' capacity to make policy in the
public interest, and will enhance corporate
power at the expense of the rights of
citizens throughout the Americas and the
Caribbean.
Most people in the affected regions have
never heard of the FTAA, although this
agreement will certainly impact all of our
lives. Negotiations have been conducted in
strict secrecy, with industry groupings
acting as advisors to the negotiators. Many
national parliamentarians were either
unaware that the negotiations were going
on, or have been denied access to
information. While trade unions and NGOs
have attempted to voice their opinions to
negotiators from various countries, there
is no evidence to date that their concerns
have been heard.
Demonstrating for Rights
Many people from around the world made
their way to Quebec, Canada in April to be
part of the demonstrations calling for
governments to “stop trading away the
rights of our people and the environment.”
Fearing a repeat of protests on the
magnitude of Seattle, the Canadian
government spent some US$30 million to
build a security fence and keep protestors
far away from the two-day meeting. For
purposes of comparison, when Central
America was hard hit by Hurricane Mitch,
Canada offered a mere US$4.5 million to
Nicaragua with $1.4 million of that
conditioned to the repayment of the
country's debt.
The meeting was a great success in the
eyes of the governments. While the official
declaration was being signed, tear gas was
used to silence the voices of the thousands
of protestors outside. With such violations
of human rights already taking place during
the signing of the document, what lies in
store when the agreement goes into effect
in 2005? The FTAA will certainly reinforce
the negative impacts of World Bank and IMF
imposed policies in our countries –
policies that have already led to severe
lack of access to health care, schools, and
jobs for people throughout the region. The
doors will be opened even wider to TNCs,
and water privatization will be among the
worst outcomes as this is a resource that
poor people still get for free in many
countries.
Trade Above All
This FTAA contradicts many other
international agreements that have been
ratified by our countries. Social rights
and basic needs such as food, water, health
and safety will be constrained by trade
rules. Governments will no longer be able
to ensure food as a basic human right by
establishing or maintaining policies that
safeguard peasants, small farmers, rural
economies and food sovereignty if these
policies act as "barriers" to trade.
Transnational corporations will be able to
sue any national government that attempts
to prevent the import of genetically
modified seeds, or the exploitation of old
growth forests, or the aggressive marketing
of tobacco to protect its citizens and the
environment.
The promotion of a so-called "development"
under the control of TNCs will hinder the
emergence of policy tools that promote
equitable and sustainable development, such
as the restriction of foreign capital in
certain sectors, the reinvestment of
profits, or limitations on the purchase of
farm land and other real estate. More
people will be excluded from the
development process as well, including
women, disabled and indigenous peoples and
other minorities.
People from all of the Americas who are
monitoring these negotiations need to
continue to resist the implementation of
the FTAA. The concept of human rights is
meant to allow us to increase levels of
social and economic welfare, and not to
expand the free trade that is destroying
people's lives and the environment.
Magda Lanuza,
FoE Nicaragua
|
|
|
|