|
|
- Info
e9912
|
issue
99
|
december 2001
|
|
bluewash
the alliance for a corporate-free
un
Do the Nike swoosh and the UN olive
branch emblem belong together? Are
McDonald's and Disney companies that
represent universal educational and
cultural values? Do giant oil companies
like Shell, BP and Chevron hold the keys to
sustainable development?
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan thinks the
answers might be yes, and he is leading a
major effort to form partnerships between
the United Nations and the business
community. The "business community," in
this case is made up of the giant
transnational corporations--companies that
have increased their power through the
process of economic globalization and come
under fire for their unjust labour and
environmental records.
Annan has encouraged all UN agencies to
form these business partnerships, including
some of those most respected for their
dedication to UN values, like UNICEF, the
International Labour Organization and the
UN Development Programme. The Secretary
General has personally spearheaded the
highest profile corporate collaboration,
the Global Compact. At the launch of the
Global Compact in July 2000, Annan shared
the podium with CEOs of companies like
Nike, Shell and Rio Tinto.
what is wrong with the
partnerships?
A partnership should be entered
between parties that share the same goals.
Global corporations do not share the same
goals as the United Nations. Therefore,
members of the Alliance for a
Corporate-Free UN (which include several
Friends of the Earth groups) believe that
"partnership" is the wrong relationship
between the UN and business.
In the case of the Global Compact, dozens
of corporations, many known for their poor
social and environmental records, have
agreed to follow nine human rights, labour
rights and environmental principles. But
there is no monitoring of corporate
adherence to these principles and no
enforcement.
Alliance members are concerned that
corporate partnership programmes will
compromise the UN's image, values and
integrity. They have written to the
Secretary General and heads of other UN
agencies to express their concern that the
Global Compact and other business
partnerships threaten the mission and
integrity of the UN. They are monitoring
companies that violate the Global Compact,
and have to date reported on Aventis, Nike,
Rio Tinto, the International Chamber of
Commerce, Unilever and Norsk Hydro.
More than 70 human rights and
environmental groups from around the world
have also endorsed an alternative to the
Global Compact -- the Citizens Compact --
which lays out a foundation for cooperation
between the UN and non-business,
non-governmental groups to work for the
proper relationships between the UN and
business. The Citizens Compact emphasizes
the need for monitoring and the enforcement
of a legal framework for corporate
behaviour.
Kenny Bruno, CorpWatch.
For more information or to endorse the
Citizen's Compact, visit
www.corpwatch.org/un. The official UN
Global Compact website can be visited at
www.unglobalcompact.org.
|
|
|
|