|
|
- Info
e9918
|
issue
99
|
december 2001
|
|
Book reviews
dirty water!
the shameful record of the giant water
companies
FoE England, Wales and Northern Ireland
(EWNI) has just published a report
detailing the environmental and social
records of some of the main water
companies. The report looks at Vivendi,
Suez, Enron and Thames Water. It reveals a
history of convictions for corruption,
pollution, corporate lobbying and
connections to oppressive regimes and human
rights abuses. Friends of the Earth
believes that these companies are not fit
to deliver the world's water, and that
public water services should be kept out of
the hands of the private sector.
The corporate records detailed in the
report include:
-
One of Vivendi's senior managers was
convicted for bribery and received a
prison sentence of one year and eight
months in July 2001.
-
One of Suez's executives was
convicted of bribery and set to prison
for four years in 1995.
-
Several water companies are currently
accused of bribery in a massive water
project in South Africa.
-
There have been a string of
prosecutions in the UK for environmental
pollution and health and safety
issues.
-
Seven out of the ten worst polluters
of 1999 as reported by the Environment
Agency were water companies.
These companies are not fit to be given
control of the world's water. Water
privatization by western companies in the
developing world has so far benefited only
the companies' shareholders, leaving people
and the environment high and dry. Handing
water services over to the private sector
has left local people with a decline in
service coupled with prices so high they
can no longer afford water.
"Dirty Water: The environmental and
social records of four multinational water
companies" is available at
www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/dirty_water.pdf.
Also see "Stealing Our Water" published by
FoE EWNI in November 2001 at
www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/gats_stealing_water.pdf.
power politics
“The fact is that what's happening today in
India is not a problem
, and the issues
that some of us are raising are not
causes
. They are huge political and
social upheavals that are convulsing the
nation. One is not involved by virtue of
being a writer or activist. One is involved
because one is a human being.”
Arundhati Roy in “Power
Politics”
Arundhati Roy's book “Power Politics”
exposes India's own unique brand of
economic globalization, and this will
likely interest many campaigners. But what
makes it most striking is Roy's ability
explain this complex topic with both
feeling and precision. Roy is not only a
Booker prize-winning fiction writer, but
also an activist who opposes big dams on
the Narmada River. Her case against
economic globalization stems from the
maddeningly illogical, corrupt and inhumane
reality of mega-dam construction in
India.
Roy cites how protest from opposition
political parties put an end to the
US-based (and now bankrupt!) energy company
Enron's 1993 agreement with the Maharashtra
state government for a 695-megawatt power
plant. The dam's opponents alleged the deal
was awash in corruption. Even Enron
admitted it had paid out millions to
“educate” politicians and bureaucrats
involved. But the story didn't end
there.
In 1996 the government of Maharashtra
signed a contract to pay Enron US$30
billion. Once they came into power, the
same political parties that had
successfully opposed the earlier deal went
on to pave the way for what has been called
the India's most massive fraud. The new
deal would mean $12 - $14 billion in
profits for Enron. But the power was so
expensive the state could not even afford
to buy it. Regardless, the state was
obligated to pay Enron $220 million
annually for the following 20 years. When
payments failed to flow, Enron threatened
to auction government properties named as
collateral in the deal.
The large TNCs that build big dams rely on
the Third World market for their lifeblood,
writes Roy. Forty percent of the world's
large dams are being built in India. As a
result there are “Fifty six million
displaced, impoverished, pulverized
people,” writes Roy.
On central India's Narmada River is the
half-built Maheshwar dam, one of 165 dams
to be built in this river valley. They are
strenuously opposed by the non-violent but
indefatigable Narmada Bachao Andolan
(Narmada People's Movement), and by
Roy.
Originally estimated to cost US$99
million, the latest estimate for the
Maheshwar dam has ballooned to $467
million. The Indian textile company S.
Kumars, which is to build the project, had
never built or operated a large dam before.
The electricity the dam produces will be 26
times more expensive than existing
hydroelectric power in Madhya Pradesh, a
state that already generates surplus power.
Yet the company's income will be guaranteed
in government funds, whether anyone buys
the electricity or not.
“So who is actually paying for this dam
nobody needs?” asks Roy. The 50,000 people
who will lose their lands and livelihoods,
is part of the answer.
Janice Wormworth,
FoEI
Power Politics by Arundhati Roy was
published by South End Press in 2001.
|
|
|
|