Personal tools
  • mobilize, resist, transform
You are here: Home english publications link gmo page 38

 

donate-portlet

 

voices icon

 

page 38

  link
  

 


percy schmeiser in his fields in saskatchewan, canada. © percy schmeiser

I've been using my own seed for years, and now farmers like me are being told we can't do that anymore if our neighbors are growing (genetically modified) crops that blow in. […] Basically, the right to use our own seed has been taken away.” Percy Schmeiser, Canadian farmer.

latest news :
Canadian supreme court tramples farmers' rights - Affirms corporate monopoly on higher life forms, read about the action

The customary right of farmers to save, use and exchange their seeds and other planting material is one of the cornerstones of agricultural practices. Traditionally, farmers have saved their best seeds and used them the following year. Now seed companies sell genetically modified seeds to many farmers, but with the agreement that they will only be used for one season. This means that farmers are forced to buy the company's seed each year.

US biotech giant Monsanto is suing US and Canadian farmers for saving their seeds and breaching patent rights. But even farmers who never bought GM seed are at risk of losing their rights to their own seeds due to genetic contamination. Monsanto is suing farmers whose fields have been contaminated by their patented GM varieties, despite the fact that those farmers never voluntarily grew GM crops. The case of Canadian farmer Percy Schmeiser is the perfect illustration of the new threats that GM crops pose to the livelihoods of farmers all over the world.

testimony by percy schmeiser about his fight against monsanto

“My name is Percy Schmeiser. I am a Canadian farmer. For the last 50 years, my wife Louisa and I have farmed 1441 acres in Bruno , Saskatchewan . We have built up a farm that works well. Rapeseed is an important crop for us, and we used to sell it all over the world for cooking oil and cattle feed. Like most farmers in Western Canada , I collected and stored my own seed. After years of selection, I had a variety that gave a good yield, was quite resistant to local diseases and was relatively weed free.

In 1997, I sprayed Roundup as usual on the weeds and stray rapeseed plants growing around my fields. I was surprised that so much rapeseed survived the application. Had I got the herbicide concentration wrong? I now realize this was the first sign that my fields had been contaminated by genetically modified (GM) rapeseed.

My neighbors and 40 percent of farmers in Western Canada plant GM rapeseed. Since 1993, Monsanto Canada has been licensed to use technology that will make plants resistant to its glyphosate herbicide, Roundup. Farmers can then use Roundup as a broad-spectrum herbicide without damaging their GM crop. In 1995, Canada approved the uncontained release of GM rapeseed, and in 1996 local companies started selling GM varieties.

Although Monsanto owns the gene and the technical know-how, they did little to contain their invention once it entered the environment. In 1998, Monsanto inspectors entered my land without permission and took rapeseed. They accused me of planting GM rapeseed without a license and prosecuted me. If Monsanto suspect farmers are growing GM rapeseed without a license, they take away rapeseed plants for inspection. If test results are positive and the license fee of Canadian $15 per acre and contract have not been met, legal proceeding for infringing Monsanto's patent follow.

In my case, GM plants had seeded themselves on my land and they pollinated my conventional rapeseed. The following planting season I tried to contain GM contamination by buying new seed, but 20 percent of my harvest was still contaminated.

In Canada there is no law against carrying rapeseed in open trucks or leaving cut rapeseed in the field. This makes it easy for the small seeds to spread. It is also impossible to contain pollen flows. The gene responsible for glyphosate resistance is a dominant gene and rapeseed is an open-pollinated plant. When a GM plant crosses with conventional rapeseed, resistance will be carried into the following generation. In my fields the GM variety was thickest along the roadway. There was little in the field itself. When I received the court summons I wondered why anyone would think I had deliberately mixed GM rapeseed with my own seed. The only advantage of growing GM rapeseed is its resistance to Roundup.

If farmers spray Roundup on a mixed GM and non-GM crop they can expect big losses. In my defense I argue that possessing the seed does not violate Monsanto's patent. It becomes a violation when I spray my crop with Roundup and activate the innovation - the gene that confers glyphosate resistance.

When this gene incorporates itself into a seed or plant, what are Monsanto's rights? The seed and plants are the farmer's property. GM rapeseed has the ability to intrude where it was not planted. It has the unique ability to replicate itself. I believe Monsanto lost its right to exclusivity when it lost control of its invention. How can farmers avoid GM rapeseed getting into their crops and becoming a contaminating weed?”

organic farmers sue big corporations

“Since wheat is the cornerstone of prairie agriculture, and essential for organic crop rotations, losing wheat to genetic contamination would devastate organic farming in Saskatchewan . […] We feel we have no choice left but to pursue legal action. This is a matter of survival for organic agriculture in Saskatchewan .” Arnold Taylor, President of the Saskatchewan Organic Directorate.

Organic farmers' communities in Canada are fighting against the genetic contamination of their organic crops. In January 2002, two organic farmers from Saskatchewan filed a class action lawsuit against biotech giants Monsanto and Aventis on behalf of all certified organic farmers in Saskatchewan . The aim of the suit was to obtain compensation for damages caused by the introduction of Aventis' and Monsanto's GM canola, and an injunction that prevents the introduction of Monsanto GM wheat in Saskatchewan . The suit also aims to make the companies liable for genetic contamination as well as trespass, negligence, and environmental pollution.

more information:

Percy Schmeiser's website : www.percyschmeiser.com Saskatchewan Organic Directorate: www.saskorganic.com

 

top table of contents


Document Actions