Personal tools
  • mobilize, resist, transform
You are here: Home english publications link trade hong kong page 21-bottom

 

donate-portlet

 

voices icon

 

page 21-bottom

  issue 109
december 2005   

 

indonesian farmer sued by seed company

p.raja siregar, walhi/friends of the earth indonesia

Mr. Tukirin, a 62-year-old farmer in the Nganjuk district of East Java, Indonesia, was very surprised when police officers came to his house and corn field and accused him of the “illegal certification” of patented seeds and of stealing seeds from a hybrid corn producer, PT BISI, a subsidiary of Asia 's largest agricultural conglomerate Charoen Pokphand.

Tukirin had not stolen any seeds. In fact, he had bought them from an authorized distributor, wanting to develop his corn cultivation skills and use the harvested corn as seeds for his next planting. The hybrid corn he had previously planted and harvested could only be sold or consumed, not used to produce seeds to plant. However, Tukirin successfully crosspollinated the second set of seeds he bought, then harvested corn that could be used as seeds and indeed grew well. He shared this discovery with other farmers.

Ironically, Tukurin's hybrid corn cultivation skills were acquired through a project coorganized by PT BISI and a local farmers' organization. Yet the company penalized Tukurin for the application of his newly acquired skills, realizing that farmers would no longer be dependent upon their product. Company officials visited Tukirin's field and then went to the police.

guilty of seed theft?

In February 2005, the court found Tukirin guilty of illegally adopting PT BISI's technique, that is committing “illegal certification”. Tukirin was sentenced to a one-year ban on planting and received a fine. Commenting on the decision, Tukirin insisted on his innocence: “I bought the seeds and planted them in my own field. Why should I be punished?” Other farmers agreed: “We were not told not to replicate the system in our fields. So what was the project for in the first place?”

In addition, the court failed to follow the proper procedures. Mr Tukirin did not know he could be represented by a lawyer, nor did the court provide one. Furthermore, he did not receive a copy of the verdict despite having asked for one. Thus, for five months he did not have access to the details of his alleged crime. It was only in June 2005 that Tukirin, accompanied by WALHI/Friends of the Earth Indonesia , managed to acquire a copy. There was no opportunity to lodge an appeal.

Tukirin's case is only one example of the lawsuits brought by large companies against small farmers; many more injustices can be expected as seed companies consolidate their control around the world.  

top


Document Actions