|
|
- Info
e9714
|
issue
97
|
april/june 2001
|
|
WHO OWNS THE
RAIN?
Water Privatization in Sri Lanka
The dictionary describes water as
colourless, tasteless and odourless - its
most important property being its ability
to dissolve other substances. We in South
Africa do not see water that way. For us
water is a basic human right, water is the
origin of all things - the giver of
life.
Poet Mazisi Kunene in "Water Is Born All
Peoples of the Earth".
Water is a valuable resource, vital to
human life. Water is owned by the commons.
South African water policy states that
"There shall be no ownership of water but
only a right (for environmental and basic
human needs) or an authorization for its
use. … Everyone has the right to have
access to sufficient water." Today however,
in many countries, including Sri Lanka,
access to clean water has become very
scarce due to human attempts to control and
manage this natural resource.
Water Changing Hands
The Sri Lankan government's proposed
National Water Resources Policy states that
"all surface and ground water are owned by
the state and managed by the government in
partnership with water users on behalf of
all Sri Lankans." This policy is the result
of ongoing natural resource privatization
as promoted by transnational corporations
and international financial
institutions.
If water becomes government property, will
we have the right to use it? Can the
government own the water under the soil of
our land? What about the air we breathe,
and who owns the rain?
Today in Sri Lanka, more and more water is
being taken out of the hands of small
communities, siphoned off for bigger
causes, and later reallocated at higher
prices. The human and environmental
consequences of such short-sighted
management cannot be underestimated. In a
region of growing demands on a limited
resource, the increasing scarcity of water
could result in devastating conflicts and
catastrophes.
Corporate Whirlpool
Rice is the staple food of our society,
and access to water is essential for its
cultivation. National policy makers and
international financial institutions
including the World Bank, the IMF and Asian
Development Bank argue that rice paddy
farmers waste water and thus must be forced
to pay for it.
If we measure the amount of water taken up
by plants against that which drains away
and evaporates, we get an average
efficiency level of about 30 percent. But
is the other 70 percent really lost? Large
amounts of it flow back into the system and
are used again downstream. The issue, then,
is whether our irrigation systems are still
efficient enough to reuse the water.
Centuries ago, King Parakramabahu
(1164-1197) constructed a system that
recycled water so that every drop was used
for agriculture. In those days, we also had
rice varieties that did not need such huge
amounts of water. The International Rice
Research Institute (IRRI) destroyed these
varieties during the Green Revolution, and
it now wants to discourage people from
engaging in paddy cultivation.
Although the Minister of Irrigation denies
that the proposed Water Resources Policy
involves the imposition of a water pricing
mechanism, a careful reading of the
proposed law shows otherwise. It is clear
that the proposed policy will protect the
rights of large companies with water
entitlements. Small users will be charged
higher prices for water, electricity and
other resources that use water.
Thousands of Bolivians took to the streets
in protest of water privatization in April
2000. British investors, including the
Bechtel corporation that catalyzed the
problems in Bolivia, were recently in Sri
Lanka on a "water mission" to explore the
scope for developing joint ventures with
Sri Lankan companies.
Right to Water, Right to Rice!
All water in the water cycle, whether on
land, underground or in surface channels;
whether falling on, flowing through or
infiltrating such systems, should be
treated as part of the commons. The water
required to meet basic human needs and to
maintain environmental sustainability must
be guaranteed as a right. The national
government should act as the custodian of
the nation's water resources, and its
powers in this regard should be exercised
as a public trust.
Hemantha Withanage,
FoE Sri
Lanka
|
|
|
|