|
|
- Info
Issue 108 - Corporate Greenwash Allows business-as-usual
22
|
issue
108
|
july 2005
|
|
corporate greenwash allows
business-as-usual
Trade liberalization has winners and
losers - and the winners include
transnational corporations scouring the
globe for new markets, weak competitors,
cheap resources and lower operating costs.
These companies have privileged access to
and influence upon governments and trade
negotiators, enabling them to make and
break the rules of the global economy to
suit their commercial interests. All of
this often comes at the expense of
communities, local economies and the
environment.
Corporate power has greatly increased in
the past decades, and companies have
managed to slip away from attempts to
regulate their behavior. They have
successfully coopted the concept of
“sustainable development” while at the same
time expanding their unsustainable
practices in the agricultural, water,
mining, energy, pharmaceuticals, chemicals
and transport sectors. They have
triumphantly promoted the idea of
‘voluntary initiatives' while continuing to
pollute, exploit and degrade environments
around the planet.
In recent years, the most influential
corporations have managed to worm their way
into various poverty-related initiatives,
including some in alliance with the United
Nations environment, labor and human rights
agencies. These are some of the very
corporations – Nike, Shell, Rio Tinto,
Novartis, BP, Daimler Chrysler, Bayer
DuPont, McDonald's, Disney, Chevron, Unocal
– that are contributing to poverty around
the world through their exploitative
activities.
Corporations have enthusiatically
embraced opportunities to show off their
newfound ‘Corporate Social Responsibility'
in highprofile initiatives such as the
‘Global Compact' between the United Nations
and industry to promote human rights and
reduce poverty. However, these ventures are
often part of a public relations strategy
that masks the less commendable activities
of involved companies. In the end,
corporate activities, both social and
antisocial, are driven by the need to bring
in profits.
|
|
|
|