Personal tools
You are here: Home english what we do oil and gas grassroots highlights wagp4
contact us

by email

by letter

 

wagp4

 

the west african gas pipeline

problem: End use


Our recommendation

Information should be provided about projected gas consumption from the pipeline, the cost of gas supplied and the terms of agreements signed with host governments regarding the sale and use of gas from WAGP.

It is unclear who will be the primary beneficiaries of gas transported through the WAGP, or what percentage of the gas will go to industrial use, domestic use, and export.

The pipeline will do nothing to increase access to energy in Nigeria, and little for Benin and Togo; and the citizens of Ghana are concerned that they too may not benefit from the extracted gas, nor share in its revenues. Ghanaians fear that the natural gas provided by WAGP will turn out to be an expensive rather than a cheap solution to the energy problem. One of the largest potential end-users, the Valco smelter in Tema (Ghana), has been off-line since last year.

The independent Dutch Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment, who reviewed the Ghana EIA, raised a set of related questions ( Advisory review on the EIS for the West-African Gas Pipeline , pdf, 137kb):

  • how does the WAGP relate to the energy planning and distribution in Ghana?
  • how can the people of Ghana benefit from WAGP?
  • how are social benefits claimed by WAGP reflected in the Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy or can they be integrated?

Read more about:

Gas flaring

Oil and Gas Conflicts in the Western Delta

Environmental Impacts

Public consultation

 

 

Document Actions