Debt-for-nature swaps (DNS) are often presented as mutually beneficial solutions: easing debt burdens for countries in the Global South while funding environmental efforts. However, they conceal a neocolonial mechanism that promotes extractivism, dependency, and erosion of sovereignty. The debts of these countries often stem from unjust, coercive agreements, forcing economies into reliance on extractive industries like mining, oil, and tourism, which cause environmental harm and displacement.

Additionally, debt-ridden governments tend to implement austerity measures that cut public spending on vital social and environmental programs, diverting funds to debt repayment. This creates a cycle where increased borrowing leads to greater dependence on extractive industries and reduced investment in social and ecological well-being.

Debt-for-nature swaps (DNS) have evolved into complex financial arrangements involving banks, investment funds, and green bonds, replacing earlier bilateral deals. The funds allocated for real conservation are often minimal, with creditors prioritizing profits. These schemes impose conditions that transfer control over territories, funds, and policies to foreign NGOs and private actors, undermining national sovereignty. Recent cases reveal that DNS primarily benefit new creditors rather than the debtor countries or biodiversity, often excluding local communities and leading to symbolic conservation efforts, evictions, and militarisation of territories.

Read the full report and the summary to understand the deeper implications of Debt-for-nature swaps